不同输注法治疗急性胰腺炎的临床效果

Effect of different phleboclysis on acute pancreatitis patients

目的探讨不同输入方法治疗急性胰腺炎的综合疗效。方法110例急性胰腺炎患者随机分为传统输液组（50例）、微量泵24h持续泵入组（30例）和微量泵12h持续泵入组（30例）。观察统计临床治疗效果、不良反应、满意度、平均住院日等。结果泵入组与传统组比较其临床治疗效果无差异性；药物不良反应泵入组明显低于传统组（P〈0．01）；满意度泵入组明显高于传统组（P〈0．05）。12h泵入组与24h泵入组比较其临床治疗效果、药物不良反应均无差异性；满意度12h泵入组高于24h泵入组（P〈0．05）。三组平均住院日传统组18d、24h泵入组16d、12h泵入组12d。结论12h泵入组各项指标优于其它组，住院天数缩短，减少了病人的经济负担，扩大了社会效益。

Objective To explore the effect of different phleboclysis on acute pancreatitis patients. Methods One hundred and ten acute pancreatitis patients were randomly divided into traditional infusion group, micro -pump 24 hours continuous infusion group and 12 hours continuous infusion group. The therapeutic effect, adverse reactions, the degree of satisfaction, average length of stay were observed. Results （1） The therapeutic effect had no significant difference between micro - pump group and traditional group （ P 〉 0. 05 ） . Adverse drug reaction in micro -pump groups were significantly lower than that in traditional group （P 〈0. 01 ） . The degree of satisfaction in micro - pump groups were significantly higher than that in traditional group （ P 〈 0. 05） . （2）The therapeutic effect and adverse drug reactions had no significant different between the 12 hours pump group and 24 hours pump group （P〉0. 05） . The degree of satisfaction in 12 hours pump group was higher than that of 24 hours pump group （P 〈 0. 05） . （3）The average length of stay were 18 d, 16 d, 12 d in traditional group, 24 hours pump group and 12 hours pump group respectively. Conclusions 12 hours pump group is superior to other groups, it can shorten the length of hospital stay, reduce the patients＇financial burden, expand social benefits.