论归责原则与侵权责任方式的关系

On the Relationship between Imputing Principles and Types of Tort Liability

我国侵权责任法第6条规定的过错责任原则、第7条规定的无过错责任原则和第24条规定的公平责任,均不适用于停止侵害、排除妨碍、返还财产、消除影响。第7条和第24条的规定还不适用于赔礼道歉、消除影响、恢复名誉。停止侵害、排除妨碍、消除影响等责任方式宜适用于第21条的规定,以免造成法律漏洞,尽管这并非我国侵权责任法的立法本意,亦非立法技术使然。返还财产可适用我国民法通则第117条第1款,或者我国物权法第34条或第245条的规定。归责原则与侵权责任方式之间的匹配关系,实际上仅限于损害赔偿(赔偿损失)、恢复原状、赔礼道歉、消除影响和恢复名誉,难以扩及其他责任方式。

The liability imputing principles stipulated in article 6, the no -fault liability in article 7 and the fair liability in article 24 of China＇ s 〈 Tort Liability Law 〉 cannot be applied to stoppage of trespass, removal of jeopardize, returning of property and elimination of influence. Seventh and twenty - fourth articles cannot be applied to apology and restoration of reputation. So types of liability such as stoppage of trespass, removal of jeopardize and elimination of influence can only apply article 21 in order to bring about legal loophole, although it is not the legislative intention and not due to legislative technique. Returning of property can apply article 117 or article 34 or article 245. So, matching relation between imputing principles and types of liability exists only in compensation for the loss, restitution, apology, elimination of influence and restoration of reputation.