期刊文献+

3种子宫切除手术在良性病变非脱垂子宫切除中的临床应用 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨比较经腹切除术(TAH),经阴式切除术(TVH)和经腹腔镜辅助阴道切除术(LAVH)3种不同的手术方式在良性病变非脱垂子宫切除中的适应证,优缺点,即各种手术方式的临床应用。方法:将良性病变非脱垂子宫切除的患者,分别分为TAH组,TVH组以及LAVH组进行临床观察与对比,对比分析各组的临床治疗效果。结果:3种手术方法在手术时间、术中出血量、肛门排气时间、术后恢复、手术费用、住院天数方面差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。TVH组、LAVH组术后肛门排气时间、术后病率、住院天数均比TAH组少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。LAVH组手术时间较TVH组、TAH组明显延长,手术费用高。结论:各种术式的子宫切除术各具有其利弊和相应的适应证。在决定手术方式时应根据患者的病情考虑各种术式的利弊,避免并发症的发生是手术成功的关键。
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 北大核心 2010年第12期1716-1718,共3页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献17

  • 1王淑贞,妇产科理论与实践(第2版),1991年,945页
  • 2Wilcox LS, Koonin LM, Pokras R, et al. Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988-1990. Obstet Gynecol,1994,83:549-555.
  • 3Health Care Technology Institute. The importance of indirect benefits when evaluating new medical technologies: a case study. The Institute, 1995. PB95-11.
  • 4Kovac SR. Guidelines to determine the route of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol,1995,85:18-23.
  • 5Mattingly RF,Thompson JD.Leiomyomata uteri and abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease. In: Mattingly RF, Thompson. JD, editors. Telinde's operative gynecology. 6th ed. Philadelphia:JB Lippincott, 1985. 230-242.
  • 6Victor Gomel MD, Patrick J, Taylor MD. Diagnostic and Operative Gynecologic laparoscopy. Prited in the united States of America. Composition by the Clarinda Company, 1994, 241.
  • 7Bolger BS, Lopes T, Monaghan JM. Laparoscopically. Assisteel vaginal hysterectomy: a report on the first 300 completed procedures. Gynecol Endosc,1997,6:77-81.
  • 8Meikle SF, Nugent EW, Orleans M. Complications and recovery from laparoscop assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol,1997,89:304-311.
  • 9Gitsch G,et al.Trends in thirty years of vaginal hysterectomy.Surg Gynecol obstect,1991,172:207~210.
  • 10Kovac SR.Guidelines to deternine the route of hysterectomy.Ob-stet Gynecol,1995,85:18~23.

共引文献284

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部