摘要
为应对日本的对外扩张,一些晚清官员提出过可分三个类型的"攻日"之策。"速攻"论者对中国军力的骄慢自信,"缓攻"论者对中国军力的改治期待,"佯攻"论者对中国军力的虚势判断,反映的只是"攻日言论"者的中国认识以及由此而形成的心态,各不相同。"遥度而非近察日本"的态度,既使"不得人心"、"贫不可支"成为这些官员对明治维新日本的共同印象,更使甲午战前"人云亦云"、"随意发想"的日本评说,20年徘徊不前、停留于盲人摸象的层面。各类"攻日"对策的提出,均未经过深思熟虑,其被动性、临时性特征显而易见。
In order to cope with the external expansion of Japan,some officials of late Qing dynasty advanced policies of attacking Japan that could be classified into three types:quick attack,postponed attack and faked attack. All these ideas were not give careful consideration and seemed passive and temporary.
出处
《史林》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第2期70-79,共10页
Historical Review
