期刊文献+

体裁差异对写作测试成绩的影响 被引量:11

The influence of genre variations on test takers’ writing performance
原文传递
导出
摘要 本课题以北京地区某大学非英语专业大学二年级选修写作课的四个平行班120名学生为研究对象,以题材相同、体裁不同的四个写作任务为研究工具,通过限时即席写作测试搜集了120篇(四种体裁各30篇)有效写作样本。两名写作教师采用整体评分方法对样本进行了评分。对样本的统计分析发现,在其他相关因素视为等同的前提下,除了记叙文体裁,议论文、应用文和说明文三种体裁写作不会对学生的考试成绩产生显著影响。本研究的目的在于为推断不同体裁类型的写作任务是否等效、是否可以在写作测试中互换使用提供实证启示。 In this study four writing tasks are designed, which cover the same topic area but involve different genre types. The tasks are used in four timed impromptu writing tests administered separately to four groups of sophomores from a university in Beijing, whose average English proficiency is comparable in general. 120 valid samples, 30 for each task, are marked by two experienced writing teachers adopting holistic scoring method. The study reveals that, with other factors considered equal, the argumentative writing, the practical writing and the explanatory writing lead to no significant difference in the students' performance, except for the narrative writing. It is expected to provide some enlightenment for examining the equivalence and interchangeability of different writing tasks in writing tests.
出处 《外语界》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期63-70,共8页 Foreign Language World
基金 全国大学英语四、六级考试委员会科研项目支持
关键词 大学英语四级考试 写作任务 体裁变化 写作成绩 CET 4 writing task genre variation writing performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Applebee A N. Writing and learning in school setting [ A ]. In Nystrand M (ed.). What Writers Know: The Language, Process and Structure of Written Discourse [ C ]. New York: Academic Press, 1982. 365 -382.
  • 2Applebee A N. Problems in process approaches: Toward a reconceptualization of process instruction [ A]. In Petrosky A R & Bartholomae D (eds.). The Teaching of Writing[ C]. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education, 1986. 95 - 113.
  • 3Bachman L F. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing [ M ]. Oxford and New York : Oxford University Press, 1990.
  • 4Freeman S W. Student characteristics and essay test writing performance [ J ]. Research in Teaching of English, 1983, (17): 313-325.
  • 5Hyland K. Second Language Writing [ M]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • 6Kroll B & Reid J. Guidelines for designing writing prompts: Clarifications, caveats, and cautions [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1994, (3) : 231 -255.
  • 7McCarthy M & Carter R. Language as Discourse : Perspectives for Language Teaching [ M ]. London : Longman, 1994.
  • 8Reid J & Kroll B. Designing and assessing effective classroom writing assignments for NES and ESL students [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1995, (1) : 17 -41.
  • 9Reid J. Responding to different topic types: A quantitative analysis from a contrastive rhetoric perspective [A]. In Kroll B (ed.). Second Language Writing[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. 191 -210.
  • 10Swales J. Examining examination papers [J]. English Language Research Journal, 1982, (3) : 9 -25.

二级参考文献4

同被引文献119

引证文献11

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部