期刊文献+

成人心理弹性量表在军校大学生中的信效度研究 被引量:31

Reliability and validity of resilience scale for adults ( RSA ) in military students
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究成人心埋弹性量表(RSA)在军校大学生中的信效度:方法采用成人心理弹性量表(RSA)和症状自评量表(SCL-90)中的抑郁、焦虑、躯体化3个因子对某军校616名学生进行整群抽样调查。结果①对RSA采用探索性因素分析,共提取5个因子,各项目在因子上的负荷在0.423~0.834之间,累计方差解释率为58.439%;②RSA各因子之间相关显著,相关系数在0.228~0.580之间;各因子与总分相关显著,相关系数在0.565~0.789之间;③效标SCL-90的抑郁、焦虑和躯体化三个因子的均分与RSA均分之间呈显著负相关,相关系数为-0.437(n=593,P=0.000);④RSA各个因子的同质性信度在0.52~0.86之间,RSA问卷信度为0.91。结论RSA量表在军校学生中信效度较好。 Objective To research the reliability and validity of resilience scale for adults(RSA) in militaRY students. Methods RSA,depression,anxiety and somatization of Self-report Symptom Checklist 90(SCL-90) were applied in this survey to 616 milital7 students. Results (1)A 5-factor structure of resilience was showed by explorative factor analysis. Each item had a factor loading between 0. 423 ~ 0. 834, and the total variance explained at 58. 439%. (2)The correlations between the subscales of the RSA were all obvious positive, ranging from 0. 228 - 0. 580;and the correlations between subseales of the RSA and total resilience were all obvious positive, ranging from 0. 565 ~ 0. 789. (3)There was a obvious negative correlation between total depression, anxiety and somatization and total resilience,the correlation coefficient was - 0. 437 ( n = 593, P = 0. 000). (4)The reliability coefficient of the RSA was 0.91 ,and the respective dimensions had Cronbach's alphas between 0.52 ~ 0.86. Conclusion The results show that RSA has acceptable reliability and validity in military students.
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第4期377-379,共3页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 基金项目:第三军医大学预研基金项目(2009XYY13) 重庆市软科学研究项目(CSTC,2009CE9038) 重庆市教育科学“十一五”规划课题(2008-GJ-231)
关键词 成人心理弹性量表 信度 效度 军校大学生 Resilience scale for adults(RSA) Reliability Validity Military students
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Richardson GE, Neiger B, Jensen S, et al. The resiliency model. Health Education, 1990,21:33-39.
  • 2Block J ,Kremen AM. IQ and ego-resiliency: conceptual and empirical connections and separateness. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1996,70:349-361.
  • 3Werner EE. Risk, resilience and recovery: perspectives from the Kauai longitudinal study. Dev Psychopathol,1993,5:503-515.
  • 4Garmezy N. Children in poverty: resilience despite risk. Psychiatry, 1993,56 : 127-136.
  • 5Friborg O,Hjemdal O, Rosenvinge JH, et al. A new rating scale for aduh resilience: what are the central protective resources behind healthy adjustment? Int J Methods Psychiatric Res,2003 ,12 :65-76.
  • 6李敏,李培培,张丽丽,陈铁流,王强,韦美,刘云波,汪涛,田玉娥.汶川地震救援武警消防官兵心理健康状况及影响因素[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2009,18(3):196-198. 被引量:15
  • 7Friborg O,Barlaug D,Martinussen M,et al. Resilience in relation to personality and intelligence. Int J Methods Psychiatri Res ,2005 ,14 :2942.
  • 8汪向东 王希林 马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,12:217-217.
  • 9Masten AS. Ordinary magic. Resilience processes in development. Am Psychol,2001,56:227-238.
  • 10Connor KM,Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: the connor-davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety, 2003,18:76-83.

共引文献2898

同被引文献333

引证文献31

二级引证文献604

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部