摘要
目的研究成人心埋弹性量表(RSA)在军校大学生中的信效度:方法采用成人心理弹性量表(RSA)和症状自评量表(SCL-90)中的抑郁、焦虑、躯体化3个因子对某军校616名学生进行整群抽样调查。结果①对RSA采用探索性因素分析,共提取5个因子,各项目在因子上的负荷在0.423~0.834之间,累计方差解释率为58.439%;②RSA各因子之间相关显著,相关系数在0.228~0.580之间;各因子与总分相关显著,相关系数在0.565~0.789之间;③效标SCL-90的抑郁、焦虑和躯体化三个因子的均分与RSA均分之间呈显著负相关,相关系数为-0.437(n=593,P=0.000);④RSA各个因子的同质性信度在0.52~0.86之间,RSA问卷信度为0.91。结论RSA量表在军校学生中信效度较好。
Objective To research the reliability and validity of resilience scale for adults(RSA) in militaRY students. Methods RSA,depression,anxiety and somatization of Self-report Symptom Checklist 90(SCL-90) were applied in this survey to 616 milital7 students. Results (1)A 5-factor structure of resilience was showed by explorative factor analysis. Each item had a factor loading between 0. 423 ~ 0. 834, and the total variance explained at 58. 439%. (2)The correlations between the subscales of the RSA were all obvious positive, ranging from 0. 228 - 0. 580;and the correlations between subseales of the RSA and total resilience were all obvious positive, ranging from 0. 565 ~ 0. 789. (3)There was a obvious negative correlation between total depression, anxiety and somatization and total resilience,the correlation coefficient was - 0. 437 ( n = 593, P = 0. 000). (4)The reliability coefficient of the RSA was 0.91 ,and the respective dimensions had Cronbach's alphas between 0.52 ~ 0.86. Conclusion The results show that RSA has acceptable reliability and validity in military students.
出处
《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2010年第4期377-379,共3页
Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金
基金项目:第三军医大学预研基金项目(2009XYY13)
重庆市软科学研究项目(CSTC,2009CE9038)
重庆市教育科学“十一五”规划课题(2008-GJ-231)
关键词
成人心理弹性量表
信度
效度
军校大学生
Resilience scale for adults(RSA)
Reliability
Validity
Military students