期刊文献+

维持性血液透析患者及家属的情绪及生活质量研究 被引量:7

A Study on the Emotion and Quality of Life of the Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients and Their Families
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:测评维持性血液透析患者及家属的情绪及生活质量,分析其影响因素。方法:以123名血液透析患者,117名家属及100名正常人为研究对象,采用自制的一般情况调查表,焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)、社会支持量表(SSRS)、自杀意向量表(SSI),SF-36进行调查。结果:患者组和家属组的SAS、SDS得分明显高于对照组(P<0.05),而主观支持得分明显低于对照组(P<0.05);患者组和家属组的SSI得分明显高于对照组(P<0.01,P<0.05);在SF-36中,患者组的生理功能得分明显高于对照组(P<0.05),其他项得分亦高于对照组(P<0.01)。家属组的生理职能、总体健康、活力、社会功能、情感职能、心理健康明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:维持性血液透析患者及家属的情绪障碍明显,生活质量严重下降。 Objective:To evaluate the emotion and quality of life of the maintenance hemodialysis patients and their families,analysis the impact factors.Methods:123 maintenance hemodialysis patients and 117 families and 100 healthy were recruited.We examined all subjects using the general information questionnaire,Self-rating Anxiety Scale(SAS),Self-rating Depression Scale(SDS),Social Support Scale(SSRS),Suicide Intent Scale(SSI),and SF-36 scale to investigate their emotion and the quality of life.Results:Compared with the control group,the scores of SAS and SDS of the patients and the families were significantly higher(P〈0.05),but the rate of subjective score and total score was significantly lower(P〈0.05).patients and their families,SSI score was significantly higher than the control group(P〈0.01,P〈0.05).But when SF-36 was considered,the PF score of the patients were significantly higher than the control group(P〈0.01),but the other,s scrores were difference(P〈0.05).Compared with the control group,the RP,GH,VT,SF,RE,MH were significantly different(P〈0.01).Conclusion:In maintenance hemodialysis treatment,the patients and their families obviously have emotional disorders,and have a serious decline in quality of life.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 2010年第2期196-197,186,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词 维持性血液透析 家属 情绪 生活质量 Hemodialysis Family Emotions The quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1叶任高.陆再英.内科学(第五版).北京科学技术出版社,2003.409.
  • 2汪向东,主编.心理卫生评定量表手册.中国心理卫生杂志社,1999
  • 3Range LM. The family of instruments that assess suicide risk. Psychopathol Behav Assessment , 2005 , 27 :133-140.
  • 4韦懿芸,颜艳,王多劳,郭艳芳,张磊,孙振球.中文版SF-36在社区老年人生存质量评价中的应用[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2006,31(2):184-188. 被引量:98
  • 5US Renal Data Sys tern. USRDS 1999 annual report ,national institutes of heath. National institutes of diabetes and digestive and kidney diseases. Bethesda,Maryland, 1999.
  • 6Finkels tein FO,Finkels tein SH. Depression in chronic dialys ispatients:As sessment and treatment. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2000, 15 : 1911-1913.
  • 7Finkelstein FO. Psychological adaptation and quality of life of the patients with end-stage renal disease. London : Oxford Univers ity Press, 1999.
  • 8Kim JH, Lee YK, Huh W, et al. Analys is of depression in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialys is patients. Korean Med Sci, 2002,17:790-794.
  • 9Tanaka K,Morumoto N,Tashim N,et al. The features of paychological problems and theirs ignifieanee in patients on hemodialyais with reference to social and somatic factors. Clinic Nephrol, 1999,51 : 161-176.
  • 10McMillan SC,Mahon M. The impact O{hospice service on the quality of lire of primary caregivers. Oncol Nurs Forum, 1994,21(7): 1189-1195.

二级参考文献15

  • 1Peek MK,Ray L,Patel K,et al.Reliability and validity of the SF-36 among older mexican Americans[J].Gerontologist,2004,144(3):418-425.
  • 2Han CW,Lee EJ,Iwaya T,et al.Development of the Korean version short-form 36 Item health survey:health related QOL of healthy elderly people and elderly patients in korea[J].Tohoku J Exp Med,2004,203(3):189-194.
  • 3Mallinson S.Listening to respondents:a qualitative assessment of short-form 36 health status questionnaire[J].Soc Sci Med,2002,54(1):11-21.
  • 4Tseng HM,Lu JF,Gandek B.Culture Issues in using the SF-36 health survey in asia:results from taiwan[J].Health Qual Life Outcomes,2003,26;1(1):72-81.
  • 5Van Swearingen JM,Brach JS.Making geriatric assessment work:selecting useful measures[J].Phys Ther,2001,81(6):1233-1252.
  • 6Tsai SY,Chi LY,Lee LS,et al.Health-related quality of life among urban,rural,and island community elderly in Taiwan[J].J Formos Med Assoc,2004,103(3):196-204.
  • 7Masud R,Masud T.Mesuring quality of life in osteoporosis[J].Age Ageing,2001,30(4):371-373.
  • 8Lam CLK,Fong DYT,Lauder IJ,et al.The effect of health-related qualityof life (HRQOL) on health service utilisation of a Chinese population[J].Soc Sci Med,2002,55(9):1635-1646.
  • 9Li TC,Liu CS,Lin CC,et al.Validation of the Chinese version of the SF-36 health survey questionnaire in people undergoing physical examinations[J].中国台湾医志,2005,10(1):8-17.
  • 10Li L,Wang HM,Shen Y.Chinese SF-36 health survey:translation,culture,adaptation,validation,and normalization[J].J Epidemiol Community Health,2003,57(4):259-263.

共引文献178

同被引文献54

引证文献7

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部