期刊文献+

世界民营化发展对公共选择理论的挑战 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 作为民营化的重要理论基础,公共选择理论认为,竞争是获得效率的万灵丹,政府行政人员的"经济人"本性造成了政府提供服务的无效率,民营化则是改变政府无效率而提高效率的最佳方式。但近30年来世界民营化的实践发展却与公共选择理论的要旨形成了两大悖论:一是在崇尚自由竞争的美国,民营化比重更小,逆民营化发展明显;二是在加拿大等更加注重福利的国家,民营化比重更大,逆民营化比例却不高。这种发展结局显然对公共选择理论的科学性提出了新的挑战。
作者 杨安华
机构地区 吉首大学
出处 《国家行政学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期113-117,共5页 Journal of China National School of Administration
基金 国家社科基金项目(07CZZ013) 吉首大学返校博士科研资助经费研究项目(jsdxkyzz200906)
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Hebdon,R.and P.Jalette.The restructuring of municipal services.Environment and Planning C.,2008,26:144–158.
  • 2Hefetz,A and M.Warner,Beyond the Market vs.Planning Dichotomy,2007,33(4):555-572.
  • 3International City/County Management Association,Profile of Alternative Service Delivery Approaches,Survey Data,Washington DC.,2002.
  • 4ICMA,ProfileofAlternativeServiceDeliveryApproaches,SurveyData,WashingtonDC,2002,2007.
  • 5Tiebout,C.A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures,Journal of Political Economy,1956(5):416-424.
  • 6[美]萨瓦斯.民营化与公私部门的伙伴关系[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002,6..
  • 7Statistics Canada.Perspectives on Labour and Income,5(8),2005,p.7.
  • 8Hefetz,A and M.Warner,Privatization and Its Reverse.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,2004 (2):171-190.
  • 9Lowery,D,Consumer sovereignty and quasi–market failure,Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.1998(2):137-172.
  • 10Bel,G.and M.Warner,Local Privatization and Costs.Working Paper.Universitat de Barcelona and Cornell University.2006.

共引文献33

同被引文献47

  • 1Tom Christensen,Per Lgreid,张丽娜,袁何俊.后新公共管理改革——作为一种新趋势的整体政府[J].中国行政管理,2006(9):83-90. 被引量:254
  • 2Wamer,M. E.and Hebdon,R. Local government restructuring:Privatization and its alternatives. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2001 (2) : 315-336.
  • 3Hefetz,A and M E.Wamer. Beyond the Market vs. Planning Dichotomy:Understanding Privatisation and its Reverse in US Cities,Local Government Stud ies,2007 (4) :555 -572.
  • 4International City/County Management Association,Profile of Ahernative Service Delivery Approaches,US Municipalities, Survey Data, Washington DC. 1992,1997,2002.
  • 5Stein R M.,The budgetary effects of municipal service contracting:a principal agent explanation,American Journal of Political Science, 1990,34 : 471-502.
  • 6Lamothe Lamothe and Feiock, Examining Local Government Service Delivery Arrangements Over Time. Urban Affairs Review, 2008 ( 1 ) : 27-56.
  • 7Hefetz,A and M E.Warner. Beyond the Market vs. Planning Dichotomy:Understanding Privatization and its Reverse in US Cities, Local Government Studies, 2007(4) : 555-572.
  • 8Bortolotti, Bernardo and Domenico Siniscalco.The Challenges of Privatization:A International Analy sis. Oxford University Press.2004,2.
  • 9Hefetz,A and M E.Warner. Beyond the Market vs. Planning Dichotomy:Understanding Privatization and its Reverse in US Cities,Local Government Studies,2007(4):555-572.
  • 10Hebdon,R. and P. Jalette. The restructuring of municipal services:a Canada-United States comparison.Environment and Planning C : Government and Policy, 2008,26:144-158.

引证文献3

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部