期刊文献+

Incidence and predictors of radial artery spasm during transradial coronary angiography and intervention 被引量:21

Incidence and predictors of radial artery spasm during transradial coronary angiography and intervention
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background Radial artery spasm (RAS) is the most common complication in transradial coronary angiography and intervention. In this study, we designed to investigate the incidence of RAS during transradial procedures in Chinese, find out the independent predictors through multiple regression, and analyze the clinical effect of RAS during follow-up. Methods Patients arranged to receive transradial coronary angiography and intervention were consecutively enrolled. The incidence of RAS was recorded. Univariate analysis was performed to find out the influence factors of RAS, and logistic regression analysis was performed to find out the independent predictors of RAS. The patients were asked to return 1 month later for the assessment of the radial access.Results The incidence of RAS was 7.8% (112/1427) in all the patients received transradial procedure. Univariate analysis indicates that young (P=0.038), female (P=0.026), small diameter of radial artery (P 〈0.001), diabetes (P=0.026), smoking (P=0.019), moderate or severe pain during radial artery cannulation (P〈0.001), unsuccessful access at first attempt (P=0.002), big sheath (P=0.004), number of catheters (〉3) (P=0.048), rapid baseline heart rate (P=0.032) and long operation time (P=0.021) were associated with RAS. Logistic regression showed that female (OR=1.745, 95% CI: 1.148-3.846, P=0.024), small radial artery diameter (OR=4.028, 95%CI: 1.264-12.196, P=0.008), diabetes (OR= 2.148, 95%CI: 1.579-7.458, P=0.019) and unsuccessful access at first attempt (OR=1.468, 95%CI: 1.212-2.591, P=0.032) were independent predictors of RAS. Follow-up at (28±7) days after the procedure showed that, compared with non-spasm patients, the RAS patients had higher portion of pain (11.8% vs. 6.2%, P=0.043). The occurrences of hematoma (7.3% vs. 5.6%, P=0.518) and radial artery occlusion (3.6% vs. 2.6%, P=0.534) were similar. Conclusions The incidence of RAS during transradial coronary procedure was 7.8%. Logistic regression analysis showed that female, small radial artery diameter, diabetes and unsuccessful access at first attempt were the independent predictors of RAS. Background Radial artery spasm (RAS) is the most common complication in transradial coronary angiography and intervention. In this study, we designed to investigate the incidence of RAS during transradial procedures in Chinese, find out the independent predictors through multiple regression, and analyze the clinical effect of RAS during follow-up. Methods Patients arranged to receive transradial coronary angiography and intervention were consecutively enrolled. The incidence of RAS was recorded. Univariate analysis was performed to find out the influence factors of RAS, and logistic regression analysis was performed to find out the independent predictors of RAS. The patients were asked to return 1 month later for the assessment of the radial access.Results The incidence of RAS was 7.8% (112/1427) in all the patients received transradial procedure. Univariate analysis indicates that young (P=0.038), female (P=0.026), small diameter of radial artery (P 〈0.001), diabetes (P=0.026), smoking (P=0.019), moderate or severe pain during radial artery cannulation (P〈0.001), unsuccessful access at first attempt (P=0.002), big sheath (P=0.004), number of catheters (〉3) (P=0.048), rapid baseline heart rate (P=0.032) and long operation time (P=0.021) were associated with RAS. Logistic regression showed that female (OR=1.745, 95% CI: 1.148-3.846, P=0.024), small radial artery diameter (OR=4.028, 95%CI: 1.264-12.196, P=0.008), diabetes (OR= 2.148, 95%CI: 1.579-7.458, P=0.019) and unsuccessful access at first attempt (OR=1.468, 95%CI: 1.212-2.591, P=0.032) were independent predictors of RAS. Follow-up at (28±7) days after the procedure showed that, compared with non-spasm patients, the RAS patients had higher portion of pain (11.8% vs. 6.2%, P=0.043). The occurrences of hematoma (7.3% vs. 5.6%, P=0.518) and radial artery occlusion (3.6% vs. 2.6%, P=0.534) were similar. Conclusions The incidence of RAS during transradial coronary procedure was 7.8%. Logistic regression analysis showed that female, small radial artery diameter, diabetes and unsuccessful access at first attempt were the independent predictors of RAS.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2010年第7期843-847,共5页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 coronary angiography intervention percutaneous coronary angioplasty radial artery spasm INCIDENCE coronary angiography, intervention percutaneous coronary angioplasty radial artery spasm incidence
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献14

  • 1YANG Yue-jin XU Bo CHEN Ji-lin KANG Sheng QIAO Shu-bin QIN Xue-wen YAO Min CHEN Jue WU Yong-jian LIU Hai-bo YUAN Jin-qing YOU Shi-jie LI Jian-jun DAI Jun GAO Run-lin.Comparison of immediate and followup results between transradial and transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in true bifurcational lesions[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2007(7):539-544. 被引量:11
  • 2Prull MW, Brandts B, Rust H, et al. Vascular complications of percutaneous transradial coronary angiography and coronary intervention. Med Klin,2005,100:377-382.
  • 3Stella PR, Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, et al . Incidence and outcome of radial artery occlusion following trans-radial artery coronary angioplasty Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 1997,40 : 156-158.
  • 4Aptecar E, Pemes JM, Chabane-Chaouch M, et al. Transulnar versus transradial artery approach for coronary angioplasty: The PCVI-CUBA study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2006, 67 : 711- 720.
  • 5Dahm JB, Vogelgesang D, Hummel A, et al. A randomized trial of 5 vs.6 French transradial percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2002, 57 : 172-176.
  • 6Kikuchi Y, Endou N, Terashima M, et al. Incidence of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary intervetion in the Japanese population. Jpn J Interv Cardiol,2000, 15:343-347.
  • 7Saito S, Ikei H, Hosokawa G, Tanaka S. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradlal coronary intervention. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv, 1999, 46:173-178.
  • 8Kiemeneij F, Fraser D, Slagboom T, et al. Hydrophilic coating aids radial sheath withdrawal and reduces patient discomfort following transradial coronary intervention: a randomized double-blind comparison of coated and uncoated sheaths. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2003, 59 : 161-164.
  • 9Saito S, Tanaka S, Hiroe Y, et al. Usefulness of hydrophilic coating on arterial sheath introducer in transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2002, 56: 328-332.
  • 10Spaulding C, Lefevre T, Funck F,et al. Left radial approach for coronary angiography: results of a prospective study. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 1996, 39 : 365-370.

共引文献53

同被引文献129

引证文献21

二级引证文献105

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部