期刊文献+

护理干预对尿结石认知及预防性治疗的影响 被引量:5

Influence of nursing intervention on raising knowledge level and preventive treatment of patients with urolithiasis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨护理干预对尿结石的认知和预防性治疗行为的影响。方法选取2008年7月至2009年7月来碎石科的尿结石患者246例,随机分为观察组(120例),对照组(126例)。对照组仅进行一般的预防性宣教;观察组实施为期3个月的护理干预,包括尿结石相关知识的讲解,预防性治疗的方法辅导,第1、2、3月末的复查以及电话随访等。结果干预后观察组尿结石相关知识水平显著高于对照组(P<0.05),预防性治疗行为显著优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论对尿结石患者实施恰当的护理干预,能有效提高患者的尿结石相关知识水平和参与预防性治疗的积极性,对开展尿结石的预防工作具有重要价值。 Objective To explore the influence of nursing intervention on raising knowledge level and behavior of preventive treatment (BPT) in patients with urolithiasis. Methods A total of 246 patients with urolithiasis from lithotrity department during July ,2008 to July, 2009 were randomly allocated into observation group ( n = 120 ) and control group ( n = 126 ). In patients of observation group, a three - month nursing intervention was implemented, including the explanation of knowledge about urolithiasis, guidance of method for preventive treatment, reexamina- tion and telephone fallow - up at the end of 1 st, 2nd and 3rd month, while those in control group only received conventional education for prevention. Results Both scores of knowledge about urolithiasis and behavior of preventive treatment in patients of observation group were significantly increased in comparison with those of control group ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion Nursing intervention can improve patients'knowledge about urolithiasis and increase their ability in performing BPT. These findings are valuble for raising the knowledge about urolithiasis in these patients, and the work for preventive treatment of urolithiasis should continuously be developed in order to reach the goal of prevention on urolithiasis.
作者 郑萍
出处 《临床和实验医学杂志》 2010年第10期751-752,共2页 Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
关键词 尿结石 健康知识 预防性治疗 护理 Urolithiasis Health knowledge Preventive treatment Nursing
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献20

  • 1吴阶平 顾六方 等.中国的尿石症[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1980,1:1-3.
  • 2任宗英 顾方六 等.营养与尿石症[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1984,5(4):202-205.
  • 3梁丽莉,郭应禄,汤慧娣,石声华.ESWL 治疗输尿管结石失败原因分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1997,18(5):273-274. 被引量:200
  • 4Singh I, Gupta NP, Hemal AK, et al. Impact of power index,hydroureteronephrosis,stone size and composition on the efficacy of in situ boosted ESWL for primary proximal ureteral calculi. Urology,2001,58:16-22.
  • 5Jonathan M, Flalkov SPH, Bernard F,et al. Reassessing the efficacy of the Dornier MFL-5000 lithotriptor. J Urol,2000 ,164 :640-643.
  • 6Eterovic D, Juretic KL, Capkun V, et al. Pyelolithotomy improves while extracorporeal lithotripsy impairs kidney function. J Urol, 1999,161:39-44.
  • 7Grenabo L,Lindqvist K, Adami HO, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of renal stones. Treatment policy is as important for success as type of lithotriptor and patient selection. Arch Surg, 1997,132:20-26.
  • 8Nancollas J H. Biolojical mineralization. Berlin:Springer -Verlag, 1982. 256 - 270.
  • 9Matouschek E. Urolithiasis. New York: Schattauer Verlag, 1981.65.
  • 10Schneider H G. Urolithiasis: Etiolojy and biagnosis.Berlin : Springer Verlag, 1985. 185 - 429.

共引文献171

同被引文献50

引证文献5

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部