侵权行为法在民法典体系中的立法模式选择探究

Legislative Mode Selection of Tort Law in Civil Code System

侵权行为法作为民法典中不可或缺的一个部分,解决其在民法典中逻辑定位的立法模式选择问题极其重要。侵权行为法立法模式有非独立模式和独立模式之分,在制定民法典的过程中,侵权行为法独立成编的呼声最高,在独立模式中,也存在不同独立程度的方式。在众多的模式中要选择何种程度的独立,其理论依据为何?在厘清责任与债的关系基本理论问题后,本文认为相对独立立法模式更具合理性。侵权行为法独立成编,承认侵权行为的相对独立特点,但并不将其彻底的从债法中独立,承认其与债法的其它部分存在有个性的共性,可以使其发挥更大的作用空间。

As an integral part of the Civil Code,Tort Law has two legislative modes：non-independent model and the independent sub-model.In the formulation process of the Civil Code,the latter one gained the most support.However,there are different degree sub-models among independent model.What is the theoretical basis for selection from a large number of models？ Answering these questions must base on the clarification of the relationship between responsibility and the basic theory of debt.This paper considers that relatively independent of the legislative model is more reasonable.It will play a greater role than to recognize violations of the relatively independent features and the rest of the existence of common personality,but not be completely independent from the debt law.