期刊文献+

SPECIAL ISSUE: SOCIAL CHANGE AND CHINESE WOMEN:Mainstream Discourse and the Construction of Public Understanding of Women's Employment* 被引量:1

SPECIAL ISSUE: SOCIAL CHANGE AND CHINESE WOMEN:Mainstream Discourse and the Construction of Public Understanding of Women's Employment*
原文传递
导出
摘要 There have been three types of mainstream discourse relating to public understanding of women's employment since the founding of the People's Republic of China in 1949. The first was the "revolutionary discourse" that dominated the era of the planned economy. During this period, knowledge about women's employment was heavily influenced by revolutionary discourse, and women were mobilized to take up positions in virtually all areas of social life. The second occurred in the transition from a planned to a market economy. During this process, knowledge of women's employment was constructed by a so-called "quality discourse," which depressed women's wages in the course of driving them back into the home. The third important mode of discourse took place in the era of marketization, and saw knowledge about women's employment constructed by male-centered hegemonic discourse in an organic union between the market economy and the patriarchal system. Meanwhile, female subjectivity in regard to knowledge about women's employment is taking shape. At the same time, women's sense of autonomy in relation to understanding of employment has started to grow and exhibits self-awareness and use of the discourse of human rights. 1949年后在妇女就业知识上存在着三种主流话语。一是计划经济时代,妇女就业知识以“革命话语”来叙述,实现了对妇女参加公共领域劳动的动员;二是从计划经济向市场经济转型的过程,妇女就业知识是以“素质话语”被叙述的,其在力图将妇女推回家庭领域的过程中压低了女性劳动力的价格;三是市场化时代,妇女就业知识以“男性强势话语”被表述,显示了市场经济与父权制的有机结合。与此同时,有关妇女就业知识的女性主体性也在形成,它显示出女性自主意识及其对人权话语的使用。
作者 Tong Xin
出处 《Social Sciences in China》 2010年第2期135-149,共15页 中国社会科学(英文版)
关键词 revolutionary discourse quality discourse male-centered hegemonic discourse 革命话语 素质话语 男性强势话语
分类号 C [社会学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献34

共引文献106

同被引文献16

  • 1陈虹.中国城市职业女性双重角色冲突的原因及其化解途径[J].内蒙古工业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,15(2):12-16. 被引量:15
  • 2Tausig, Mark. Work and Mental Health [A]. in Handbook of the Sociology of Mental Health[M]. Edited by Aneshensel, Carol. S. and Jo C. Phelan. New York: Kluwer Academic Press,1999.
  • 3Simon, R. W.. Gender, Multiple Roles, Role Meaning, and Mental Health[J]. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1995, 36 (2).
  • 4Menaghau, E. G.. Role Changes and Psychological Well-being: Variations in Effects by Gender and Role Repertoire[J]. Social Forces, 1989, 67 (3).
  • 5Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E.. Social Causes of Psychological Distress[M]. New York: Adline, 1989.
  • 6Glenys Parry. Paid Employment, Life Events, Social Support, and Mental Health in Working-Class Mothers[J]. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1986,27 (2).
  • 7Treas, Judith, Tanja van der Lippe, & Tsui-o Chloe Tai. The Happy Homemaker? Married Women' s Well-Being in Cross-National Perspective[J]. Social Forces, 90 (1).
  • 8Gjerdingen, D., P. McGovern, M. Bekker, U. Lundberg, T. Willemsen. Women's Work Roles and Their Impact on Health, Well-Being, and Career: Comparisons Between the United States, Sweden, and The Netherlands[J]. Women & Health, 2008, 31 (4).
  • 9Pearlin Leonard I. The Stress Process Revisited: Reflections on Concepts and Their Interrelationships[A]. in Handbook of the Sociology of Mental Health[M]. Edited by Aneshensel, Carol. S. and Jo C. Phelan. New York: Kluwer Academic Press,1999.
  • 10Wheaton, Blair. Models for the Stress-Buffering Functions of Coping Resources[J]. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1985, 26 (4).

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部