期刊文献+

MR动态增强成像在诊断良恶性骨病中的应用价值 被引量:3

The application of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis of differentiating benign skeletal masses from malignant ones
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨MR动态增强成像在诊断良恶性骨病中的应用价值。方法:36例骨病患者(良性14例,恶性22例)行DCE-MRI检查。于动态增强图像上测量信号增强幅度(SEE)、早期动态增强斜率值(Slope值)、向心性增强率(DER),判断TIC曲线类型,采用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线选择良恶性病变鉴别诊断的阈值,计算各参数对病变潜在恶性估计的敏感度、特异度和准确度。结果:①36例病例中,恶性病变组共22例,均为Ⅲ型(100%);良性病变组共14例,呈Ⅲ型者2例(14.29%),呈Ⅱ型者5例(35.71%),Ⅰ型者7例(50%)。若以Ⅲ型为恶性病变,Ⅰ、Ⅱ型均视为良性病变为诊断标准,则TIC类型对病变潜在恶性评估的准确度为94.3%;②良恶性两组间SEE、Slope值、DER分别为227.96±172.08、325.6±125.86(P>0.05);(0.97±0.67)%/s、(2.53±0.91)%/s(P<0.05);0.2043±0.0487、0.2267±0.0402(P>0.05)。Slope值对病变潜在恶性估计的准确度为91.4%。结论:DCE-MRI可以反应病变组织的血管化与灌注,有助于鉴别骨骼系统病变的良恶性,且以TIC类型准确度最高,最有价值。 Objective:To assess the diagnostic potential of DCE-MRI in the accuracy of differentiating benign from malignant skeletal masses.Methods:DCE-MRI was performed on 36 patients using Siemens Sonata 1.5 T MR scanner.SEE,slope value and TIC type were gained on DCE-MRI.Subjective overall performance of the techniques was evaluated with ROC analysis.Results:① In 36 patients,Ⅲ curve was found in 24 cases(malignant for 22 and benign for 2),Ⅱ curve in 5 cases and Ⅰ curve in 7 cases(all were benign).As Ⅲ curve was considered malignant and Ⅰ,Ⅱ curve were regarded as benign,the diagnostic accuracy of TIC type was 94.3%;② SEE,Slope value and DER in benign and malignant group were respectively 227.96±172.08,325.6±125.86(P0.05);(0.97±0.67)%s,(2.53±0.91)%s(P0.05);0.2043±0.0487,0.2267±0.0402(P0.05),The diagnostic accuracy of Slope value were 91.4%.Conclusion:DCE-MRI can depict tissue vascularization and perfusion.It was valuable in differentiating benign from malignant skeletal masses.The diagnostic accuracy of TIC type was the highest.
出处 《医学影像学杂志》 2010年第4期550-553,共4页 Journal of Medical Imaging
关键词 骨骼疾病 磁共振成像 动态增强成像 Skeletal masses Magnetic resonance imaging Dynamic contrast enhancement
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Makoto K,Yoshifumi S,Kenshi S,et al.Evaluation of tumor blood flow in musculoskeletal lesions:dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and its possibility when monitoring the response to preoperalivechemotherapy-work in progress[J].Japan Radiological Society,2007,25:94-105.
  • 2Lang P,Honda G,Roberts T,et al.Musculoskeletal neoplasm:perioneoplastic edema versus tumor on dynamic postcontrast MR imaging with spatial mapping of instantaneous enhancement rates[J].Radiology,1995,197:831-839.
  • 3靳激扬,杨世埙,许建荣,庄奇新,高晓鸣,李明华,王皖,乔瑞华,何鸿渊,王永刚.动态增强磁共振成像对肌肉骨骼系统肿瘤性质鉴别的定量研究[J].中华放射学杂志,1999,33(9):588-591. 被引量:20
  • 4Ceimaerdt MJA,Hogendoom PCW,Bolem JL,et al.Cartilaginous tumors:fast contrast-enhanced MR imaging[J].Radiology,2000,214:539-546.
  • 5Erlemann R,Reiser MF,Peters PE,et al.Musculoekeletal neoplasms:static and dynamic Cd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging[J].Radiology,1989,171:767-773.
  • 6Nagele T,Ptersen D,Klose U,et al.Dynamic contrast enhancement of intracranial tumors with snap shot-FLASH MR imaging[J].AJNR,1993,14:89-98.
  • 7Ross JS,Delamarter R,Hueftle MG,et al.Gadolinium-OTPA enhanced MR imaging of the postoperative lumber spine:time course and mechenism of enhancement[J].AJR,1989,152:825-834.
  • 8Verstraete KL,De Deene Y,Roels H,et al.Benigh and malignant musculoskeletal lesions:dynamic contrst-enhanced MR imaging-parametric "first-pas s" images depict tissue vascularization and perfusion[J].Radiology,1994,192:835-843.
  • 9Buadu LD,Murakami J,Murayama S,et al.Breast lesions:correlation of contrast medinm enhancement pattens of MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis[J].Radiology,1996,200:639-649.
  • 10孟悛非,吕衍春,吕凤华,程晓玫,张朝晖,陈应明,梁康福,陈美霞,邹文星,阮超美.增强MR灌注成像在骨骼-软组织肿瘤良恶性鉴别诊断中的价值[J].中华放射学杂志,2001,35(8):578-583. 被引量:46

二级参考文献7

共引文献60

同被引文献13

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部