期刊文献+

期刊评价指标SJR、JIF和H指数的关系研究 被引量:23

Research on the Relationship and Comparison Between the SJR,JIF,and H-index
原文传递
导出
摘要 以SSCI与SCOPUS收录重合的38种国际图书情报期刊为例,通过Spearman相关系数对SJR、JIF和H指数三种学术期刊评价指标之间关系进行研究,并对三者的优缺点进行归纳。结果表明,SJR、JIF和H指数三者呈线性关系,但由于SJR同时兼顾期刊被引数量与质量而更优。最后,对这些评价指标进行探讨与展望。 Taking 38 international library and information science journals which are overlapped journals included in SSCI and SCO- PUS as examples, the author judges which index is superior by Spearman' s correlation coefficients of the SJR, JIF, and H-index, and then carries out the research on the relationship among them and compares the advantages and disadvantages of the three indices. The results show that, in evaluating the journals S JR is superior to other indices because of SJR taking into account the quantity and quality of cited journals ; SJR, JIF, and H-index had a linear relationship among the three indices. Finally, these indices for journal evaluation are discussed.
作者 王一华
出处 《图书情报工作》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第6期145-147,共3页 Library and Information Service
关键词 SJR JIF H指数期刊评价 SJR JIF H-index journal evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献16

  • 1金碧辉.科学家为自己设计了一项评价指标:h指数[J].科学观察,2006,1(1):8-9. 被引量:71
  • 2中国科学技术信息所,1989-1998中国科技论文统计与分析(年度研究报告),1999年
  • 3张娅群,张海英.科学引文及思考[J].情报杂志,1997,16(1):35-36. 被引量:1
  • 4Pablo D. Batista,M?nica G. Campiteli,Osame Kinouchi. Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?[J] 2006,Scientometrics(1):179~189
  • 5Wolfgang Gl?nzel. On the h-index - A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact[J] 2006,Scientometrics(2):315~321
  • 6Leo Egghe,Ronald Rousseau. An informetric model for the Hirsch-index[J] 2006,Scientometrics(1):121~129
  • 7Leo Egghe. Theory and practise of the g-index[J] 2006,Scientometrics(1):131~152
  • 8Liming Liang. h-index sequence and h-index matrix: Constructions and applications[J] 2006,Scientometrics(1):153~159
  • 9Michael G. Banks. An extension of the Hirsch index: Indexing scientific topics and compounds[J] 2006,Scientometrics(1):161~168
  • 10Lutz Bornmann,Hans-Dieter Daniel. Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?[J] 2005,Scientometrics(3):391~392

共引文献244

同被引文献411

引证文献23

二级引证文献182

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部