期刊文献+

协商民主视角下对我国公共决策听证制度运行过程的系统分析 被引量:3

A Systematic Analysis of Movement Process of Administrative Decision-making Hearing System from the Perspective of Deliberative Democracy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 协商民主理论代表了西方民主的最新发展,在我国也受到了广泛关注。公共决策听证制度是协商民主的制度实践形式,具有协商民主的功能。公共决策听证制度在实践中的运行是一个系统过程,由听证信息公开—听证代表的遴选—听证会的召开—听证笔录的处理四个环节组成,它们之间在时间上前后贯通,在内容上相互联系,共同作用实现了公共决策听证制度的协商民主功能。 Deliberative democracy theory is the newest achievement in Western nation.It has received the widespread attention in China.Administrative decision-making hearing system coincide with deliberative democracy.It has became deliberative democracy into a reality from a theory.The movement process of administrative decision-making hearing system is a systematic process,it includes four main aspects.The four aspects link and in-fluence one after another,realize the function of deliberative democracy.
作者 武文英
出处 《系统科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期61-64,共4页 Chinese Journal of Systems Science
关键词 协商民主 公共决策听证制度 系统过程 eliberative democracy dministrative decision-making hearing system systematic process
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1陈家刚.协商民主引论[J].马克思主义与现实,2004,56(3):26-34. 被引量:337
  • 2[美]詹姆斯·伯曼,威廉·雷吉主编.协商民主:论理性与政治[M].陈家刚等译.北京:中央编译出版社,2006:213—214,227—228.
  • 3[南非]毛里西奥·帕瑟琳·登特里维斯.作为公共协商的民主:新的视角(王英津译)[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2006.

二级参考文献33

  • 1Joaeph M. Bessette, "Deliberative Democracy : The Majority Principle in Republican Govemment", in How Demo-cralic Is the Constitution? eds. Robert A. Goldwin and William A. Schambra, Washington : American Enterprise Institute, 1980.P. 102 - 116.
  • 2Bernard Manin, On Legitimacy and Pditical Deliberation, Political Theory. 1987, 15:338 - 368; Joshua Cohen, Deliberation and Democrafic Legitimacy, Alan Hamllin and Philip Pettit eds. The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989.P17- 34.
  • 3Jon Elster Edited, Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge University Press, 1998. P.6.3.
  • 4Jon FAster Edited, Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge University Press, 1998. P.44.
  • 5Maeve Cooke, Five Arguments for Deliberative Democracy, Political Studies, 2000, Vol,48,P.947 - 969.
  • 6David Miller, Is Deliberative Democracy Unfair to Disadvantaged Groups? Democracy as Public Deliberation: New Perspectives, Edited by Maurizio Pasaerin D' entreves, Manchester University Press, 2002. P.201.
  • 7Carolyn Hendriks, The Ambiguous Role of Civil Society in Deliberative Democracy, Refereed Paper Presented to the Jubilee Conference of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Australian National University, Canberra, October 2002.
  • 8Christian Hunold,Corporalism, Pluralism and Democracy: Toward a Deliberative Theory of Bureaucratic Accountability. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, Vol. 14, No. 2, Blackwell Publishers, 2001.
  • 9Jorge M. Valadez, Deliberative Democracy, Political Legitimaey, and Self- Democracy in Multicultural Societies, USA Westview Press, 2001. P. 30.
  • 10Joshua Cohen, Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy, Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, Edited by James Bohman and William Rehg, The MIT press, 1997. P. 67.

共引文献339

同被引文献13

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部