期刊文献+

Identifiler体系在276例单亲亲权鉴定中的应用分析 被引量:3

Usefulness of Identifiler system in 276 cases of duo paternity testing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨Identifiler体系在单亲亲权鉴定案例中的应用价值。方法采用荧光标记STR-PCR复合扩增、毛细管电泳基因分型技术,应用3100 Avant遗传分析仪对276例单亲亲权鉴定的个体进行15个短串联重复串联序列(STR)基因座的基因分型。结果在276例的单亲亲权鉴定中,认定亲权关系199例,占72.10%,其中亲权指数(CPI)≥2 000,父权相对机会(RCP)≥99.95%有183例,13例CPI<2 000,3例出现一个基因座单步突变;排除亲权关系77例,占27.90%,其中2例只出现1~2个不符合遗传规律基因座,通过加测母亲样本,排除指标均大于3个。结论应用Identifiler体系的15个STR基因座对常规单亲亲权案例能成功地开展鉴定分析工作,但当CPI<2 000或有1~2不符合遗传规律基因座时,须增加检测基因座和加测母亲样本,以提高亲权指数或增加排除指标,规避可能的错误鉴定结论。 Objective To analyze the application value of Identifiler kit in duo paternity testing.Methods The technique of fluorescent dye labeling multiplex STR-PCR and capillary electrophoresis and DNA sequencer GeneScan.Genetyping of 15 short tandem repeat(STR) were adopted in genetyping a sample of individuals in 276 cases parentage testing by using 3100 Avant.Results Among 276 cases of duo parentage testing,199 cases of determined paternal relation were 72.10% in all cases,and cumulative paternity index(CPI) was 2 000 or more than 2 000.In 183 cases,the relative chance of paternity(RCP) was 99.95% or more than 99.95%.And CPI of 13 case was small than 2 000,3 cases had a step mutation of a gene locus.77 cases were excluded paternity relationship.The percentage was 27.9% in all cases.2 cases had one to two loci incoordinated genetic law in these exclusive cases,then exclusive indexes were more than three items by additional detecting mother′s sample.Conclusion Using Identifiler system of 15 STR loci can successfully analyze duo paternity testing.But worth of watching,when CPI is small than 2 000 or having 1-2 incoordinate gene loci,we must add to determine more loci or sample of mother for improving CPI or exclusive index,and then avoiding error identification conclusion.
出处 《重庆医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第9期1063-1065,共3页 Chongqing medicine
关键词 Identifiler 短串联重复序列 单亲亲子鉴定 突变 Identifiler STR duo parentage testing mutation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献71

  • 1王瑞恒,王立铭,杜泓,刘克健,张忱宏,郑白宇.辽南地区人群9个STR基因座的多态性分析[J].中国法医学杂志,2002,17(4):237-239. 被引量:7
  • 2李海燕,台运春,陆惠玲,刘超,陈先勤.中国汉族人群15个STR基因座的等位基因频率调查[J].中国法医学杂志,2004,19(6):330-333. 被引量:36
  • 3梁晓华,于卫建,胡荣花.PCR-STR16位点试剂盒在父子二联体亲子鉴定的应用[J].中国输血杂志,2005,18(2):140-141. 被引量:1
  • 4赵珍敏,柳燕,林源.Identifiler^(TM)系统在亲子鉴定中的突变观察和分析[J].法医学杂志,2007,23(4):290-291. 被引量:24
  • 5Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LE, et al. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations [J]. Mol Ecol 1998,7(5):639-655.
  • 6Thomson JA, Pilotti V, Stevens P, et al. Validation of short tandem repeat analysis for the investigation of cases of disputed paternity [J].Forensic Sci Int, 1999,100(1-2):1-16.
  • 7Primorac D, Schanfield MS. Application of forensic DNA testing in the legal system [J]. Croat Med J,2000,41(1):32-46.
  • 8National Reasearch Councll. DNA technology in forensic science[M]. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1992.185.
  • 9Department of Justice. The future of forensic DNA testing: predictions of the Research and Development Working Group[M]. Washington, DC: U.S.Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, 2000.82.
  • 10Li CC, Chakravarti A. Basic fallacies in the formulation of the paternity index [J]. Am J Hum Genet, 1985,37(4):809-818.

共引文献50

同被引文献15

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部