摘要
现实的人是社会发展的主体,通过马克思在《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中对黑格尔等唯心论者异化观的批判及资本主义劳动异化理论的剖析,分别从人的自然性、社会性和历史性方面论述了人作为社会发展主体的现实性。《手稿》写作时的马克思还没有实现向唯物史观的彻底转变,我们必须客观认识《手稿》的这一过渡性特征,既不能将《手稿》中科学性因素无限夸大,用《手稿》来代替整个马克思主义,也不能彻底否定其中具有天才萌芽的价值性因素。
Man in reality is the subject of social development. In Manuscripts of Economics Philosophy in 1884, Marks respectively discussed the reality of human as the subject of social development from the natural, social and historical qualities of human beings after criticizing the theory of alienation of idealists like Hegel and analyzing the theory of alienation on capitalism labors. When "Manuscripts" were written, Marks had not realized the thorough transformation into the materialist view of history. Therefore, it is necessary for us to understand this transitional characteristic of "Manuscripts" objectively, in other words, we should not exaggerate the scientific factors in "Manuscripts", nor could we substitute "Manuscripts" for the whole Marxism, and negate some factors of value with talent buds thoroughly.
出处
《西安石油大学学报(社会科学版)》
2010年第2期91-95,共5页
Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Social Science Edition
关键词
异化劳动理论
社会发展主体
现实性
过渡性
alienated theory of labor
the subject of social development
reality
transition