摘要
目的探讨组织多普勒成像评价肥厚型心肌病舒张功能的价值。方法回顾性对比分析肥厚型心肌病组(60例)及正常对照组(30例)超声心动图检查结果,比较组织多普勒参数与常规超声参数评估左室舒张功能的价值。结果肥厚型心肌病组左心房前后径、面积、室间隔厚度、室间隔与左室后壁厚度比值(IVS/LVPW)、二尖瓣E峰速度与二尖瓣环舒张早期峰值速度比值(E/Em)和左心室充盈压均显著高于对照组(P〈0.01),E/A在两组差异无统计学意义(P=0.67),Em显著低于对照组[(7.84±2.43)cm/s对(10.87±2.18)cm/s,P〈0.01]。肥厚型心肌病组E/Em与左房前后径及面积有相关关系(分别r=0.331,P=0.017;r=0.325,P=0.019),而E/A与二者无相关性。结论组织多普勒参数(Em,E/Em)是评价肥厚型心肌病患者心脏舒张功能的敏感方法。
Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of tissue Doppler imaging(TDI) for diastolic function in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Methods Sixty patients with HCM and thirty age-matched control were enrolled in this study. Parameters of conventional echocardiogram and TDI were compared. Results In the HCM group, left atrial diameter, left atrial area, thickness of inter-ventricular septum(IVS), ratio of IV'S to left ventricular posterior wail (IVS/LVPW), E/Era and left ventricular filling pressure were statistically higher than those of control group ( P 〈0.01, respectively), Em was significantly lower( P 〈0.01 ). There was no statistical difference on E/A between HCM and control group ( P = 0.67). E/Era was correlated positively with left atrial diameter and area in the HCM group(r = 0.331, P = 0.017; r = 0.325, P = 0.019,respectively). However, E/A had no statistical correlation with left atrial diameter and area ( r = 0. 205, P = 0. 142; r = 0. 255, P = 0. 066,respectively). Conclusions Compared with the conventional Doppler echocardiogram, the parameters of TDI (Era,E/Era) were more sensitive in evaluation of diastolic function in HCM patients.
出处
《中华超声影像学杂志》
CSCD
北大核心
2010年第4期289-291,共3页
Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
基金
基金项目:科技部“863”项目(2007AA022457),“973”项目(2007CB512107)
关键词
超声心动描记术
多普勒
心肌病
肥厚性
心室功能
左
Echocardiography
Doppler
Cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic
Ventricular function, left