期刊文献+

异丙肾上腺素预处理对大鼠胰腺移植后缺血再灌注损伤的抑制作用 被引量:1

Preconditioning of pancreatic graft with isoproterenol reduces posttransplant ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨减轻大鼠胰腺移植后缺血再灌注损伤的保护作用机制.方法:IPC后动态检测大鼠胰腺组织热休克蛋白表达.建立大鼠胰腺移植缺血再灌注模型,选择表达热休克蛋白高峰时段供体大鼠胰腺移植作为实验组,未预处理供体大鼠胰腺移植作为对照组.移植后6h,采集静脉血及移植胰腺.热休克蛋白70(HSP70)分别用Westernblot法及免疫组织化学法检测.免疫组织化学法测定肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)表达.流式细胞仪检测胰腺细胞凋亡率.碘淀粉比色法检测血淀粉酶水平.结果:IPC后供体大鼠胰腺中HSP70的表达在24h达到高峰,与其他各时段比较具有显著差异(0.92±0.25vs0.24±0.04,0.34±0.06,0.58±0.07,0.62±0.11,0.25±0.09,均P<0.05),IPC后6h,12h,24h,36h大鼠胰腺中HSP70的表达与未预处理组相应时段比较差异也显著(0.34±0.06vs0.28±0.07,0.58±0.07vs0.25±0.04,0.92±0.25vs0.27±0.05,0.62±0.11vs0.25±0.06,均P<0.05),48h恢复到原来水平.而未预处理组各时段间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).HSP70主要表达于胰腺腺泡细胞及血管壁.对照组胰腺组织中TNF-α、细胞凋亡率、中性粒细胞、血淀粉酶的水平明显升高,与假手术组相比差异显著(均P<0.01).实验组降低了胰腺组织中TNF-α、细胞凋亡率、白细胞数、血淀粉酶的水平,与对照组比较差异具有统计学意义(11929±1220vs46111±3127,26.7%±4.5%vs37.4%±4.7%,3308±531vs6668±1506,1057IU/L±148IU/Lvs1408IU/L±195IU/L,均P<0.05).结论:IPC减轻了大鼠胰腺移植后缺血再灌注损伤,IPC保护作用与HSP70的诱导生成有关. AIM: To determine the protective effects of isoproterenol preconditioning (IPC) against ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats after pancreas transplantation and to explore mechanisms involved. METHODS: The expression of heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) in the pancreas of rats undergoing IPC was detected at different time points after IPC. A rat model of posttransplant pancreatic ischemia/reperfusion injury was established.The donor rats that showed high expression of HSP70 in the pancreas were used as experiment group, while donor rats that did not undergo IPC were used as control group. The blood and pancreatic samples were taken 6 h after pancreas transplantation. The expression of HSP70 in the pancreas was detected by Western blot and immunohistochemistry. The expression of TNF-α in the pancreas was detected by immunohistochemistry. Serum amylase was determined by iodine colorimetry. The apoptosis rate of pancreatic cells was determined by flow cytometry. RESULTS: The expression level of HSP70 in the pancreas of donor rats reached the peak at 24 h after IPC, which was significantly higher than those at other time points (0.92 ± 0.25 vs 0.24 ± 0.04, 0.34 ± 0.06, 0.58 ± 0.07, 0.62 ± 0.11 and 0.25 ± 0.09, respectively; all P 0.05). The expression levels of HSP70 in the experimental group at 6, 12, 24 and 36 h after IPC were significantly higher than those in the control group at corresponding time points (0.34 ± 0.06 vs 0.28 ± 0.07, 0.58 ± 0.07 vs 0.25 ± 0.04, 0.92 ± 0.25 vs 0.27 ± 0.05 and 0.62 ± 0.11 vs 0.25 ± 0.06, respectively; all P 0.05) but returned to normal level at 48 h. No significant differences were noted in the expression levels of HSP70 among each time point in the control group. HSP70 was mainly expressed in pancreatic acinar cells and the vessel wall. The expression level of TNF-α, apoptosis rate, neutrophil count and serum amylase significantly increased in the control group when compared with those in sham-operated group (all P 0.01). However, the levels of these parameters significantly decreased in the experiment group when compared with those in the control group (11 929 ± 1 220 vs 46 111 ± 3 127, 26.7% ± 4.5% vs 37.4% ± 4.7%, 3 308 ± 531 vs 6 668 ± 1 506 and 1 057 IU/L ± 148 IU/L vs 1 408 IU/L± 195 IU/L, respectively; all P 0.05). CONCLUSION: Isoproterenol preconditioning reduces ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats after pancreas transplantation perhaps by inducing the production of HSP70.
出处 《世界华人消化杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2010年第9期871-876,共6页 World Chinese Journal of Digestology
基金 辽宁省教育厅高校科研基金资助项目 No.202012014~~
关键词 异丙肾上腺素预处理 胰腺移植 缺血再灌注损伤 热休克蛋白70 Isoproterenol preconditioning Pancreatic transplantation Ischemical reperfusion injury Heat shock protein 70
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Mohan P,Soft K,Little DM,Donohoe J,Conlon P,Walshe JJ,O'Kelly P,Thompson CJ,Hickey DP.Improved patient survival in recipients of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant compared with kidney transplant alone in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal disease.Br J Surg 2003; 90:1137-1141.
  • 2Hopt UT,Drognitz O.Pancreas organ transplantation.Short and long-term results in terms of diabetes control.Langenbecks Arch Surg 2000; 385:379-389.
  • 3Orsenigo E,Fiorina P,Cristallo M,Socci C,La Rocca E,Maffi P,Invemizzi L,Zuber V,Secchi A,Di Carlo V.Long-term survival after kidney and kidneypancreas transplantation in diabetic patients.Transplant Proc 2004; 36:1072-1075.
  • 4Obermaier R,Drognitz O,Benz S,Hopt UT,Pisarski P.Pancreatic ischemia/reperfusion injury:impact of different preservation temperatures.Pancreas 2008; 37:328-332.
  • 5Oehmann C,Benz S,Drognitz O,Pisarski P,Hopt UT,Obermaier R.Remote preconditioning reduces microcirculatory disorders in pancreatic ischemia/reperfusion injury.Pancreas 2007; 35:e45-e50.
  • 6Obermaier R,Benz S,Von Dobschuetz E,Drognitz O,Schareck W,Jonas L,Messmer K,Hopt UT.Characterization of microcirculatory disturbance in a novel model of pancreatic ischemia-reperfusion using intravital fluorescence-microscopy.Pancreas 2002; 25:142-148.
  • 7Woeste G,Wullstein C,Meyer S,Usadel KH,Hopt UT,Bechstein WO,von Dobschuetz E.Octreotide attenuates impaired microcirculation in postischemic pancreatitis when administered before induction of ischemia.Transplantation 2008;86:961-967.
  • 8Frossard JL,Bhagat L,Lee HS,Hietaranta AJ,Singh VP,Song AM,Steer ML,Saluja AK.Both thermal and non-thermal stress protect against caerulein induced pancreatitis and prevent trypsinogen activation in the pancreas.Gut 2002; 50:78-83.
  • 9Saluja A,Dudeja V.Heat shock proteins in pancreatic diseases.J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 23 Suppl 1:S42-S45.
  • 10Weitzmann A,Baldes C,Dudek J,ZimmermannR.The heat shock protein 70 molecular chaperone network in the pancreatic endoplasmic reticulum -a quantitative approach.FEBS J 2007; 274:5175-5187.

同被引文献48

  • 1张树栋,马潞林,王国良,侯小飞,罗康平,赵磊.胰肾联合移植术后并发十二指肠瘘的处理[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2005,17(4):302-304. 被引量:2
  • 2于立新,余玉明,邓文锋,徐健,付绍杰,杜传福,王亦斌,叶桂荣,刘小友,苗芸,李川江,叶俊生.胰肾联合移植后长期存活患者的临床观察[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(7):458-461. 被引量:5
  • 3Waki K, Sugawara Y, Tamura S, Yamashiki N, Fu- jita H, Kadowaki T, Kokudo N. Simultaneous pan- creas-kidney transplantation in the United States: an analysis of the UNOS registry. Clin Transpl 2010: 35-44.
  • 4Gruessner AC, Sutherland DE. Pancreas transplant outcomes for United States (US) cases as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR). Clin Transp12008: 45-56.
  • 5Sutherland DE, Gruessner R, Kandswamy R, Hu- mar A, Hering B, Gruessner A. Beta-cell replace- ment therapy (pancreas and islet transplantation) for treatment of diabetes mellitus: an integrated approach. Transplant Proc 2004; 36:1697-1699.
  • 6Petruzzo P, Badet L, Lefrancois N, Berthillot C, Dorel SB, Martin X, Laville M. Metabolic conse- quences of pancreatic systemic or portal venous drainage in simultaneous pancreas-kidney trans- plant recipients. Diabet Med 2006; 23:654-659.
  • 7Cattral MS, Bigam DL, Hemming AW, Carpentier A, Greig PD, Wright E, Cole E, Donat D, Lewis GF. Portal venous and enteric exocrine drainage versus systemic venous and bladder exocrine drainage of pancreas grafts: clinical outcome of 40 consecutive transplant recipients. Ann Surg 2000; 232:688-695.
  • 8Kortmann B, Pirzkall A, Pfeffer F, Hopt UT, Scha- reck WD. Portal venous and enteric exocrine drain- age in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplanta- tion: experience with 70 consecutive transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 2003; 35:2102-2103.
  • 9Stratta RJ, Shokouh-Amiri MH, Egidi MF, Grewal HP, Kizilisik AT, Gaber LW, Gaber AO. Simulta-neous kidney-pancreas transplant with systemic- enteric versus portal-enteric drainage. Transplant Proc 2001; 33:1661-1662.
  • 10Jimenez-Romero C, Manrique A, Meneu JC, Cam- bra F, Andr6s A, Morales JM, Gonzleez E, Hemen- dez E, Morales E, Praga M, Gutierrez E, Moreno E. Compative study of bladder versus enteric drainage in pancreas transplantation. Transplant Proc 2009; 41:2466-2468.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部