威权型领导力对下属工作绩效的影响:领导-成员交换的调节作用被引量：7

The Impact of Authoritarian Leadership on Subordinates'Performance: the Moderating Role of Leader-member Exchange

下载PDF

导出

摘要本研究以深圳15家企业中253名员工和52名领导为研究对象,研究威权型领导力对下属工作表现(包括任务绩效和组织公民行为)的影响,并探讨了领导-成员交换质量在上述影响过程中所起的调节作用。多重回归分析表明:威权型领导力消极的影响下属的工作表现,而领导-成员交换质量对这一消极的影响有着改善的作用,相对于LMX较低的员工,LMX较高的员工在威权型领导行为的影响下,其工作表现会相对好一些。 Drawing on a cross-organizational sample of 227 supervisor-subordinate dyads and 52 teams from Shenzhen, we examined the effect on subordinates＇ performance （including task performance and organizational citizenship behavior） of authoritarian leadership, and explored the moderating effect of LMX on relationship between authoritarian leadership and performance. Multiple regression analysis showed that： although authoritarian leadership have the negative effects on both of performance and LMX, LMX altered the relationships of authoritarian leadership and performance, in that these relationships were stronger for individuals scoring low （versus high） on LMX.

作者周明建阮超

机构地区哈尔滨工业大学深圳研究院

出处《管理学家（学术版）》 2010年第4期49-58,共10页

关键词威权型领导力领导-成员交换任务绩效 authoritarian leadership LMX performance

分类号 C933 [经济管理—管理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献32

1Aryee, S., Budhwar, P. S., &Chen, Z. X. (2002). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3), 267-285.
2Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L. Y., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 191- 201.
3Aycan, Z., & Kanungo R. N. (2006). Paternalism: Towards conceptual refinement and operationalization. In K. S. Yang K. K. Hwang, & U. Kim (Eds.), Scientific advances in indigenous psychologies: Empirical, philosophical, and cultural contributions, London: Sage, 445-466.
4Beehr, T. A., Jex, S. M., Stacy, B. A., & Murray, M. A. (2000). Work stressors and coworker support as predictors of individual strain and job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21:391-405.
5Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P., & Farb, J. L. (2004). Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7:89-117.
6Connell, J. & Ferres, N. (2003). A. Travaglione. Engender ing trust in manager-subordinate relationships: Predictors and outcomes. Personnel Review, 32(5): 569-587.
7Dansereau, F. J. Graen, G. & Haga, W. J. (1975). A Vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13 (1): 46-78.
8Cunningham, J. B. & MacGregor, J. (2000). Trust and the design of work: Complementary constructs in satisfaction and performance. Human Relation, 53(12): 1575-1591.
9Duffy, M. K. Ganster, D. & Pagon, M. (2002). Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2): 331-351.
10Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In J. T. Li, A. 5;. Tsui, & E. Weldon (Eds.), Management and organizations in the Chinese context, London: Macmillan, 84-127.

二级参考文献11

1[1]Dansereau F J,Graen G,Haga W J.A Vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations:A longitudinal investigation of the role-making process.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,1975,13(1):46～78
2[2]Dienesch R M,Liden R C.Leader-member exchange model of leadership:A critique and further development.Academy of Management Review,1986,11(3):618～634
3[3]Liden R C,Graen G.Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership.Academy of Management Journal,1980,23(3):451～465
4[4]Graen G,Cashman J F.A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations:A developmental approach.In:Iiunt J G,Larson L L,eds.Leadership frontiers.OH:Kent State University Press,1975:143～165
5[5]Dansereau F J.A dyadic approach to leadership:Creating and nurturing this approach under fire.Leadership Quarterly,1995,6(4):479～490
6[6]Graen G B,Uhl-Bien M.Relationship-based approach to leadership:Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25years:Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective.Leadership Quarterly,1995,6(2):219～247
7[7]Dansereau F J,Alutto J A,Yammarino F J.Theory testing in organizational behavior:The variant approach.NJ:Prentice-Hall,1984
8[8]Yammarino F J.Investigating contigencies:An examination of the impact of span of supervision and upward controllingness on;eader-member exchange using traditional and multivariate within and between-entities analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology,2000,85(5):659～677
9[9]Gerstner C R,Day D V.Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory:Correlates and construct issues.Journal of Applied Psychology,1997,82(6):827～844
10[10]Schriesheim C A,Castro S L,Cogliser C C.Leader-member exchange(LMX) research:A comprehensive review of theory,measurement,and data-analytic practices.Leadership Quarterly,1999,10(1):63～113