期刊文献+

不同形态型雄性罗氏沼虾的交配能力 被引量:5

Mating capacity of male Macrobrachium rosenbergii with different morphotypes
原文传递
导出
摘要 从行为生态学角度,对采自孟加拉国库尔纳专区羌纳县布苏尔河罗氏沼虾原产地池塘种群中3种不同形态型雄虾的繁殖行为及交配能力进行了初步研究.结果表明:社群中蓝螯型(BC)、橙螯型(OC)和小型(SM)雄性罗氏沼虾的交配行为模式没有明显的区别,但BC、OC和SM雄虾在交媾前守卫、交媾及精荚传递和交媾后守卫3个典型行为中投入的时间存在明显差异.BC雄虾交媾前守卫、交媾及精荚传递用时明显比OC、SM雄虾短,而交媾后守卫用时明显比OC、SM雄虾长.SM雄虾在交媾前守卫和精荚传递上投入的时间最长,而交媾后守卫用时最短.在雌虾体质量为雄虾体质量的80%,且♀∶♂为8∶1性比条件下,BC、OC和SM雄虾在120h内平均交媾次数分别为4.6、2.2、1.3,BC雄虾具有较强的连续交媾能力.罗氏沼虾的交配能力与其体质量相关,雄、雌虾的体质量相匹配才能保证成功交媾.否则会出现"假交"现象. From the viewpoint of behavioral ecology,a pilot study was made on the mating capacity of male Macrobrachium rosenbergii with different morphotypes(blue claw,BC;orange claw,OC;runt or small male,SM) native to the Pusur River in Chalna County of Khulna Division,Bangladesh.No significant differences were observed in the mating behavioral modes among the male morphotypes,but the time invested in such typical mating behaviors as pre-/postcopulatory mate-guard and copulation/spermatophore transfer for BC,OC and SM had distinct difference.BC spent much less time than OC or SM on precopulatory guard(PG) and spermatophore transmission(ST),but much more time on post-copulatory guard.SM spent the longest time on PG and ST,and the shortest time on postcopulatory guard.The average frequencies of successive copulation in 120 h were respectively 4.6,2.2,and 1.3 at the sex ratio of 8:1(♀:♂) in BC,OC and SM when the body mass of the females was 80 percent of the males.BC possessed much stronger capacity of successive copulation.The mating capacity of male M.rosenbergii was not only related to its own body mass,but also related to the body mass of female M.rosenbergii.Only when the males and females matched to some extent in their body mass,could the copulation be guaranteed in success.Otherwise,false copulation would occur.
作者 王春 成永旭
出处 《应用生态学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第4期1043-1048,共6页 Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology
基金 上海市科委科技攻关项目(08DZ1206002) 上海市重点学科项目(y1101)资助
关键词 罗氏沼虾 雄虾 形态型 交配能力 Macrobrachium rosenbergii male morphotype mating capacity.
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1John MC. Bionomics and life history of Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de Man). Bulletia of Central Research Institute of the University of Kerala Series C ( Natural Science), 1957, 5:93-102.
  • 2Lagler KF. Natural populations of the giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de Man ). International Conference on Prawn Farming, Vietnam, 1975: 13-14.
  • 3Ra'arian Z. The ontogeny of social structure in the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de Man). Ph.D. Thesis. Hebrew: Hebrew University of Jerusalem Israel, 1952:101-102.
  • 4Cohen D, Ra' anan Z, Brody T. Population profile development and morphotypic differentiation in the giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de Man). Journal of the World Mariculture Society, 1981, 12 : 231 -243.
  • 5Smith TIJ, Sandifer PA, Smith MH. Population structure of Malaysian prawns Macrobrachium rosenbergii ( de Man) reared in earthen ponds in South Carolina, 1974- 1976, Journal of the World Mariculture Society, 1978, 9 : 19-38.
  • 6Ra' anan Z, Cohen D. Characterization of size distribution development in the freshwater prawn Macrobrachlum rosenbergii ( de Man ) juvenile populations. Crustaceana, 1984, 46:271-282.
  • 7Barki A, Karplus I, Goren M. The agonistic behaviour of the three male morphotypes of the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii ( Crustacea, Palaemonidae). Behaviour, 1991, 116:252-277.
  • 8Barki A, Karplus I, Goren M. Morphotype related dominance hierarchies in males of the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii (Crustacea, Palaemonidae). Behaviour, 1991, 117:145-160.
  • 9Barki A, Harpaz S, Karplus I. Contradictory asymmetries in body and weapon size, and assessment in fight- ing male prawns, Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Aggressive Behaviour, 1997, 23 : 81-91.
  • 10Karplus I, Harpaz S. Preliminary observations on behavioural interactions and distribution patterns of freshwater prawns Macrobrachium rosenbergii under semi-natural conditions (Decapoda, Caridea). Crustaceana, 1990, 59:193-203.

二级参考文献5

共引文献7

同被引文献31

  • 1de Visser JAGM, Elena SF. The evolution of sex: Empirical insights into the roles of epistasis and drift. Natural Review Genetics, 2007, 8: 139-149.
  • 2Haigh J. The accumulation of deleterious genes in apopulation Muller's Ratchet. Theoretical Population Biology, 1978, 14: 251-267.
  • 3Rice WR, Chippindale AK. Sexual recombination andthe power of natural selection. Science, 2001, 294:555-559.
  • 4Lynch M, Berger R, Butcher D, et al. The mutationalmeltdown in asexual populations. Journal of Heredity,1993, 84: 339-344.
  • 5Hubbard EJA, Greenstein D. Introduction to the germline. WormBook, 2005, doi/10.1895/ wormbook.1.18.1.
  • 6Zarkower D. Somatic sex determination. WormBook,2006, doi/10. 1895/ wormbook. 1. 84. 1.
  • 7Hodgkin J. Problems and paradigms: Genetic sex determination mechanism and evolution. BioEssays, 1992,14: 253-261.
  • 8Singson A, Hill KL, L'Hernault SW. Sperm competition in the absence of fertilization in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics, 1999, 152: 201-208.
  • 9Morran LT, Cappy BJ, Anderson JL, et al. Sexual partners for the stressed: Faculative outcrossing in the selffertilizing nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Evolution,2009, 63: 1473-1482.
  • 10Chasnov JR, Chow KL. Why are there males in the hermaphroditic species Caenorhabditis elegans? Genetics,2002, 160: 983-994.

引证文献5

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部