期刊文献+

0~15MeV中子诱发^239Pu裂变产额能量关系的评价研究 被引量:1

Evaluation of dependence of cumulative fission yields on incident-neutron energy for ^239Pu( n, f)
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究0~15MeV中子诱发^239Pu裂变产物的累积产额随人射中子能量变化的关系。方法使用加权平均和ZOTT评估的方法对裂变产物核的累积产额实验数据进行评价推荐,通过SPCC程序拟合和多模式模型理论首次得出产额能量关系。结果评价推荐了0~15MeV中子诱发^239Pu裂变的^85Kr^m、^87Kr、^88Kr和^138Xe 4个重要气体产物核的累积产额数据,给出了产额能量关系曲线。评价后的数据与国际上ENDF/B-VII、JENDL-3.1、JEF-2.2和CENDL-2等数据库的推荐数据进行了比较,使相关数据得以更新和补充。理论计算结果可以在定性上与实验拟合曲线进行比较。结论^87Kr和^88Kr的累积产额随能量增加呈上升趋势,而^85Kr^m和^138Xe呈现直线型的关系曲线。多模式理论计算结果可以定性地反映实验拟合曲线的趋势。 Objective To study the dependence of cumulative fission yields on incident-neutron energy for ^239Pu( n, f). Methods The experimental yield data were evaluated by using codes AVERAGE for weighted average and ZOTT for simultaneous evaluation. The multi-modal model was used to calculate the energy dependence of yields. Results The experimental yield data were evaluated at different neutron energies for gas fission products ^85 Kr^m , ^87 Kr, ^88r and ^138Xe resulting from the ^239Pu ( n, f) reaction. The energy dependence of the cumulative fission product yields on the incident neutron was presented and recommended. The evaluated curves of product yield versus neutron energy were compared with the results calculated by the TALYS code. Conclusions The energy curves of yieid showed the rising trend for ^87Kr and ^88Kr, but the linear functions for ^85Kr^m and ^138Xe. The muhi-modal model calculation may qualitatively describe the energy dependence of yields for the ^239Pu(n,f) reaction.
出处 《中华放射医学与防护杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第2期120-123,共4页 Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
基金 国家973项目(2009GB107001,2008CB717803) 高等学校博士点专项科研基金(200610001023)
关键词 ^239Pu 气体产物核 累积产额 产额能量关系 ^239Pu Gas nuclides Cumulative yield Energy dependence of yield
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1International Atomic Energy Agency.Fission product yield data for the transmutation of minor actinide nuclear waste.Vienna:IAEA,2008.
  • 2IAEA.EXFOR.Experimental nuclear reaction data,nucleus ZA94239.quantity"FY".2009.http://www-nds.iaea.org/exfor/exfor.htm.
  • 3Mills RW.Fission product yield evaluation.University of Birmingham.1995:31.
  • 4Muir DW.Evaluation of correlated data using partitioned least squares:a minimum variance derivation.Nucl Sci Eng,1989,101(1):88-93.
  • 5Brosa U.Grossmann S,Muller A.Nuclear scission.Phys Rep,1990.197(4):167-262.
  • 6Ihara H.Tables and figures from JNDC nuclear data library for fission products,Version 2.Report JAERI-M 89-204.Tokai:JAERI,1989.
  • 7Chadwick MB,Oblozinsky P,Herman M.et al.ENDF/B-Ⅶ.0:Next generation evaluated nuclear data library for nuclear scienceand technology.Nuclear Data Sheets,2006,107(12):2931-3060.
  • 8Koning A,Forrest R,Kellett M,et al.The JEFF-3.1 nuclear data library,JEFF Report 21.Paris:CFC,2006:19-36.
  • 9Nakagawa T,Shibata K,Chiha S,et al.Japanese evaluated nuclear data library version 3 revision-1.J Nucl Sci Tech,1995,32(12):1259-1271.
  • 10刘廷进.国际评价中子核数据库[J].原子核物理评论,2001,18(3):192-196. 被引量:7

二级参考文献1

  • 1Liu Tingjin,Report 12 th Meeting Working Party Int Nuclear Data Evaluation Cooperation JARERI Tokai,2000年

共引文献6

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部