期刊文献+

下颌角弧形截骨术对咀嚼功能的影响 被引量:5

The influence on masticatory function after curved osteotomy of prominent mandibula's angle
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 通过对下颌角弧形截骨手术前后咬合力的研究,分析手术对咀嚼功能的影响,从而进一步指导临床.方法 对2008年1至10月行下颌角弧形截骨术的20例女性患者(年龄16~38岁)手术前后切牙区、双侧前磨牙区、双侧磨牙区最大咬合力进行测定,比较手术前及术后6个月时咬合力的变化.结果 术前前牙区、右侧前磨牙区、左侧前磨牙区、右侧磨牙区、左侧磨牙区最大咬合力分别为:(11.7±3.9)kg、(23.2±1.6)kg、(30.9±2.3)kg、(35.6±4.2)kg、(38.5±3.1)kg.术后6个月测定的最大咬合力分别为:(11.9±2.1)kg、(23.0±4.5)kg、(31.0±1.8)kg、(35.9±3.5)kg、(38.5±2.7)kg,各牙区最大咬合力达到甚至略高于术前水平.术后6个月与术前比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05).结论 下颌角弧形截骨手术对最大咬合力及咀嚼功能无明显影响. Objective To investigate the influence of mandibuiar curved osteotomy on masticatory function by analyzing the bite force before and after operation. Methods From Jan. to Oct. 2008, 20 female cases underwent mandibuiar curved osteotomy. The maximal bite force in incisor area, bilateral premolar area and molar area was measured before operation and 6 months after operation. Results The maximal bite force in incisor area, right premolar area, left premolar area, right molar area, left molar area was (11.7 ±3.9) kg、(23.2 ± 1.6)kg、 (30.9 ±2.3) kg、 (35.6 ±4.2) kg、 (38.5 ±3.1) kg, respectively before operation; and was (11.9 ±2. 1) kg、 (23. 0 ± 4. 5) kg, (31. 0 ± 1. 8) kg, (35.9 ± 3.5) kg、 (38.5 ±2.7) kg, respectively 6 months after operation. The postoperative maximal bite force reached the preoperative level, and even slightly above it. There was no significant difference between the measured data before operation and 6 months afterward ( P 〉 0. 05 ) . Conclusions The curved osteotomy of prominent mandibuiar angle has no long-term effect on masticatory function.
出处 《中华整形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第2期93-95,共3页 Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery
关键词 颌面外科手术 截骨术 咬合力 Maxillofacial surgery Osteotomy Bite force
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献25

  • 1杜本军,柳大烈,梁莉,贾玉荣.下颌角磨削去骨术前后咬肌变化[J].第三军医大学学报,2005,27(23):2376-2378. 被引量:10
  • 2穆雄铮,王炜,杭榆,王毅敏,冯胜之.口内外联合进路下颌角肥大截骨整形术[J].中华整形烧伤外科杂志,1996,12(2):104-106. 被引量:29
  • 3Weijs WA, Hillen B. Correlation between the cross sectional area of the jaw muscles and craniofacial size and shape [J]. Am J Phys Anthrop, 1986,70(4):423-431.
  • 4Lo LJ, Mardini S, Chen YR. Volumetric change of the muscles of mastication following resection of mandibular angles: a long-term follow-up[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2005,54(5):615-621.
  • 5Katsumata A, Fujishita M, Ariji Y, et al. 3D CT evaluation of masseter muscle morphology after setback osteotomy for mandibular prognathism [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2004,98(3):461-470.
  • 6Huisinga-Fischer CE, Zonneveld FW, Vaandrager JM, et al. Relationship in hypoplasia between the masticatory muscles and the craniofacial skeleton in hemifacial microsomia, as determined by 3-D CT imaging[J]. J Craniofac Surg,2001,12( 1 ):31-40.
  • 7Mackool RJ, Hopper RA, Grayson BH, et al. Volumetric change of the medial pterygoid following distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: an example of the associated soft-tissue changes [J]. Plast Reconstr Surg,2003,111(6):1804-1807.
  • 8Takashima M, Kitai N, Murakami S, et al. Volume and shape of masticatory muscles in patients with hemifacial microsomia [J]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J,2003, 40(1):6-12.
  • 9Huisinga-Fischer CE, Vaandrager JM, Prahl-Andersen B. Longitudinal results of mandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia[J]. J Craniofac Surg,2003,14(6):924-933.
  • 10Williams PE, GoldsPikn G. Changes of sareomere length and physiological properties in immobilization musele [J]. J Anat,1978, 127(3):459-468.

共引文献110

同被引文献64

引证文献5

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部