期刊文献+

甲型H_1N_1流感流行期间大学生的风险认知与心理行为调查 被引量:5

Investigation on Risk Perception and Psychological Behaviors of College Students under the Epidemic Period of Influenza A (H_1N_1)
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解在校大学生在甲型H1N1流感疫情中的风险沟通、风险认知和心理行为情况及其之间的相互关系,对高校甲型H1N1流感疫情防控具有指导意义。方法以杭州师范大学下沙校区学生为对象,采用随机抽样方法进行问卷调查。结果有效问卷中82.8%的大学生认为疫情信息发布充分,83.5%认为甲型H1N1流感不可怕;调查显示大学生对甲型H1N1流感的预防措施、临床表现、传播性和传染性认知度较高,对病因、病死率、愈后等信息认知度较低;女大学生对疫情信息的认知更敏感,日常应对行为更加积极(t=-3.945,P<0.01;t=-2.745,P<0.01);医学类大学生的风险认知和心理行为反应度比非医学类高(t=-6.6575,P<0.01;t=-3.396,P<0.01);大学生风险认知与其心理状态情况相关(r=0.331),与日常行为改变情况相关(r=0.324)。结论不同特征的大学生风险认知和心理行为变化情况不同,大学生风险沟通、风险认知与心理行为的变化存在相关关系。 Objective To investigate risk communication,risk perception and psychological behaviors of college students under the epidemic period of Influenza A(H1N1)and to analyze interrelationship between these factors.Methods Students in Xiasha campus of Hangzhou Normal University were chosen by stratified sampling method and investigated by using questionnaires.Results 82.8% students investigated believed that the epidemic information was sufficiently released and 83.5% students considered Influenza A(H1N1)did not horrible.Moreover,the college students possessed higher cognition on preventive measures,clinical manifestation,dissemination and infection of Influenza A(H1N1)but owned lower cognition on pathogenesis,fatality rate and prognosis of it.Female students were more sensitive to epidemic information and held more positive attitude to change behaviors(t=-3.945,P〈0.01;t=-2.745,P〈0.01).Students major in medicine were more sensitive on risk perception and psychological behaviors compared others(t=-6.6575,P〈0.01;t=-3.396,P〈0.01).Risk perception of college students was related both to their psychological state(r=0.331)and routine response behavior(r=0.324).Conclusion Risk perception and psychological behaviors varies among the students with different features.
出处 《浙江预防医学》 2010年第5期4-5,8,共3页 Zhejiang Journal of Preventive Medicine
关键词 甲型H1N1流感 风险认知 心理行为 Influenza A(H1N1) Risk Perception Psychological Behaviors
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献27

  • 1谢晓非,徐联仓.风险认知研究概况及理论框架[J].心理科学进展,1995,5(2):17-22. 被引量:179
  • 2何元庆,姚本先.论高校危机管理策略[J].扬州大学学报(高教研究版),2005,9(3):32-34. 被引量:18
  • 3Kahneman D, Tversky A. Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 17~43
  • 4Slovic P. Perception of Risk. Risk Analysis, 1987, 236 (17): 280-285
  • 5Covello V T, Peters R G, Wojtecki J G, Hyde R C. Risk Communication, the West Nile Virus Epidemic, and Bioterrorism: Responding to the Communication Challenges Posed by the Intentional or Unintentional Release of a Pathogen in an Urban Setting. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2001, 78 (2): 382~391
  • 6Fischhoff B. Risk perception and communication unplugged: Twenty years of process. Risk Analysis, 1995, 15 (2): 137~144
  • 7Slovic P. Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis, 1999, 19 (4): 689~701
  • 8Kruk G. Risk communications and the management of EMF risks, EMF risk perception and communication. Proceedings International Seminar on EMF Risk Perception and Communication, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 1998. 95~118
  • 9Gray P. Improving EMF risk communication and management: The need for analysis and deliberation, EMF risk perception and communication. Proceedings International Seminar on EMF Risk Perception and Communication, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 1998. 51~68
  • 10Slovic P. Informing and Educating the Public About Risk. Risk Analysis, 1986, 6(4): 403~415

共引文献352

同被引文献72

引证文献5

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部