期刊文献+

MVision图像质量优化算法研究

The Development of Optimization Algorithm on MVision Image Quality
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的优化MVision协议重建图像的画面质量,提高图像的空间分辨率、软组织对比度,减少图像的噪声信号和"吸盘"伪影。方法采用了平滑滤波、边缘增强、边缘保留和MVision解剖滤波等各种图像优化算法,对MVision协议的原始重建图像进行优化处理,并将通过不同算法处理后的各图像序列进行配准比较。结果经过平滑滤波后的图像与经边缘增强、边缘保留处理后的图像相对比,前者软组织显像更清晰,而后者图像空间分辨率更高,但出现较多噪声信号。同时,结合解剖滤波处理后的图像,其吸盘伪影也基本消失。结论通过有目的性地选用各种MVision协议图像优化算法,可以在不同程度上实现对MVision图像质量的优化。 Objective Optimizing the image quality of the MVision protocol, improving the space resolution, soft tissue contrast, reducing the noise signal and sucker pan artifact. Methods Adopting the smoothing filter, edge enhance, edge preservation and anatomy filter algorithms to optimise the reconstruction image, and then comparing the several image sequences which are delt with by different algorithms. Results Comparing the images of smoothing filter with the images of edge enhance, edge preservation, the former seems clearer soft tissue image, but the latter seems higher image room resolution and more noise signal. Meanwhile, if the anatomy filter algorithm is utilized to deal with the image, the sucker pan artificate disappears. Conclusions In order to optimise the image quality of MVision protocol, we should appropriately select the various optimisation algorithms to improve the image quality.
出处 《临床医学工程》 2010年第5期10-12,共3页 Clinical Medicine & Engineering
基金 广东省自然科学基金(06024583) 广东省科技计划项目(2007B01040056)
关键词 MVision协议 吸盘伪影 空间分辨率 优化算法 MVision protocol Sucker pan artificate Space resolution Optimisation algorithms
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1尹雷明,徐寿平,周桂霞.螺旋断层放射治疗[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2009,17(1):56-58. 被引量:8
  • 2Langcn KM, Meeks SL, Poole DO, et al. The use of megavohage CT (MVCT) images for dose recomputations [J] . Physics in Medicine and Biology, 2005, 50 (18) : 4259-4276.

二级参考文献23

  • 1Mackie TR, Holmes TW, Swerdloff S, et al. Tomotherapy: A new concept for the delivery of dynamic conformal radiotherapy. Med Phys, 1993, 20(6) :1709.
  • 2Tubiana M, Eshwege F. Conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy-clinical data. Acta Oncol,2000,39 (5) :555.
  • 3Hatano K, Narita Y, Araki H, et al. 3D-CRT and intensity modulated radation therapy (IMRT). Gan To Kagaku Ryoho,2003,30( 13 ) :2050.
  • 4Beavis AW. Is tomotherapy the future of IMRT? Br J Radiol, 2004,77 (916) :285.
  • 5Zeidan OA, Langen KM, Meeks SL, et al. Evaluation of image-guidance protocols in the treatment of head and neck cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2007,67 (3) :670.
  • 6Jeraj R , Mackie TR, Balog J, et al. Radiation characteristics of helical tomotherapy. Med Phys,2004,31 ( 12 ) :396.
  • 7Langen KM, Zhang Y, Andrews RD, et al. Initial experience with megavoltage(MV) CT guidance daily prostate alignments. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2005,62(5) :1517.
  • 8Kupelian PA, Langen KM,Zeidan OA, et al. Daily varliations in delivered doses in patients treated with radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2006,66(3) :876.
  • 9Langen KM, Meeks SL, Poole DO, et al. The use of megavohage CT (MVCT) image for dose recomputations. Phys Med Biol,2005,50( 18 ) : 4259.
  • 10Gayou O,Parda DS, Johnson M, et al. Patient dose and image quality from mega-voltage cone beam computed tomography imaging. Med Phys, 2007,34(2) :499.

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部