摘要
目的探讨中医药在治疗慢性胃炎证候疗效中的优势。方法收集门诊慢性胃炎患者65例,随机分为治疗组(33例)和对照组(32例)。治疗组给予中药辨证论治治疗,对照组依据西医常规诊疗方案予以治疗,两组疗程均为4周。通过"胃肠病中医证候评分表"观察两组证候疗效及评价各证候的积分差异。结果两组治疗后证候总积分均较治疗前明显降低(P<0.01),其中治疗组优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组显效11例,有效20例,无效2例,总有效率为93.9%;对照组显效9例,有效18例,无效5例,总有效率为84.3%,治疗组明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。对"食后腹胀""精神疲乏""四肢乏力""精神疲倦""失眠多梦"等证候的改善治疗组优于对照组(P<0.05),而在改善患者"胃脘疼痛"方面对照组优于治疗组(P<0.05)。结论在具体证候方面,中西医在治疗上各有优势;但在总体疗效和证候总积分方面,中医治疗均优于西医,反映了中医药治疗慢性胃炎在结局指标方面具有一定的优势。
Objective To observe the advantages of Chinese medicine in the treatment of chronic gastritis. Methods Sixty-five cases of chronic gastritis were randomly divided into two groups : treatment group in which 33 cases were treated by Chinese medicine on syndrome differentiation and control group in which 32 cases were treated by routine western medicine, with a course of four weeks. The clinical efficacy and syndrome scores were observed before and after treatment. Results The total syndrome scores of the two groups were decreased markedly after treatment( P 〈0.01 ), with more significant decrease in the treatment group than in the control group(P 〈0.05). The total effective rate was 95.9% in the treatment group, higher than 84.3% in the control group(P 〈0.05). The treatment group had better effect than control group in the improvement of after-meal abdominal distention, fatigue, limb weakness and insomnia(P 〈0.05 ), while the control group had better effects than treatment group in the relief of epiagstric pain( P 〈0.05 ). Conclusion Chinese medicine and westen medicine have some advantages in the treatment of chronic gastritis, but Chinese medicine is better than western medicine in the improvement of syndromes.
出处
《上海中医药杂志》
2010年第5期37-39,共3页
Shanghai Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金
上海市教委科研基金资助项目(J50305)
关键词
慢性胃炎
中医证候
疗效观察
Chronic gastritis
Chinese medical syndrome
clinical observation