期刊文献+

“的确/确实”的主观化与语法化——兼议“的确”与“确实”的差异 被引量:10

The Grammaticalization and Subjectivization of "de que"(的确) and "que shi"(确实) and their Differences
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章从共时层面上分析了“的确/确实”主观性程度在客观评注——客观/主观评注——主观评注——话语标记的差异。相应的,“的确/确实”出现的语境也有差别,表现在对照式语境——非对照式语境——独用语境方面。“的确/确实”在客观性的语体中出现频率偏低,这是其主观性特征的语体证明。“的确/确实”经历了单用、短语用法、形容词用法、副词用法的语法化过程。“的确”、“确实”在用法方面也存在着一定差异。 The paper begins with a synchronic analysis of "di que"(的确) and"que shi"(确实)with different degrees of subjectivity which find expression in the continuum: objective comment 〉 objective/subjective comment 〉 subjective comment〉 discourse marker. The corresponding contexts of "di que" and"que shi "vary with the changing situations, which find expression in the aspects of contrastive context, non--contrastive context and independent context. The research has proved that "di que" and "que shi " seldom appear in the objective contexts, which is a stylistic evidence to the subjective feature of "di que" and "que shi ". The grammaticalization process of "di que" and "que shi " finds expression in their independent use, their uses in phrases or as adjectives or adverbs though their uses are somewhat different.
作者 魏红
出处 《云南师范大学学报(对外汉语教学与研究版)》 2010年第3期46-51,共6页 Journal of Yunnan Normal University(Teaching & Studying Chinese as a Foreign Language Edition)
基金 云南省2007-2008年度哲学社会科学基金项目“面向东南亚国家的汉语国际推广的学科策略研究”阶段性成果
关键词 的确/确实 主观性 语法化 差异 "di que" and "que shi " subjectivization grammaticalization difference
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献23

  • 1沈家煊.词义与认知——《从词源学到语用学》评介[J].外语教学与研究,1997,29(3):77-79. 被引量:42
  • 2沈家煊.R.W.Langacker的“认知语法”[J].当代语言学,1994(1):12-20. 被引量:176
  • 3Benveniste, E. 1971. Problems in General Linguistics [M]. Trans. M. E. Meek. Coral Gablres, FL: University of Miami Press.
  • 4Bright, W. 1992. Internatioanl Encyclopedia of Linguistics [M]. 4 vols. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 5Carey, K. 1995. Subjectification and the development ofthe English perfect [A]. In Stein & Wright 1995.83-102.
  • 6Finegsn, E. 1995. Subjectivity and subjectivisation:an introduction [A]. In Stein & Wright 1995. 1-15.
  • 7Halliday, M. A. K. 1975. Learning How to Mean [M]. London: Edward Arnold.
  • 8Keller, R. 1995.The epistemic weil [A]. In Stein & Wright 1995. 16-30.
  • 9Kuno, S. 1987. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy [M]. Chicago and London:The University of Chicago Press.
  • 10Langacker, R. W. 1987/1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar [M]. Vols. Ⅰ & Ⅱ.Stanford: Stanford University Press.

共引文献2865

同被引文献71

引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部