期刊文献+

基于ADINA、ANSYS、FLAC的强度折减法 被引量:8

The strength reduction method based on ADINA,ANSYS and FLAC
下载PDF
导出
摘要 与传统极限平衡法相比,强度折减法有众多优势。计算程序和屈服准则是影响强度折减求安全系数的重要因素。以某复杂边坡为例,通过ANSYS-ADINA和ANSYS-FLAC接口程序,建立ADINA、ANSYS、FLAC同套网格模型,克服网格对安全系数的影响。计算中分别选用M-C和D-P准则,分析得出:相对于D-P准则,M-C准则求得的安全系数偏于保守;对于一系列的D-P准则,外角点外接圆D-P和内切圆D-P求得的安全系数分别对应上限和下限;对于同种屈服准则,有限差分法比有限元法求得的安全系数略大。 Compared with the traditional limit equilibrium,the strength reduction method has many advantages. The computational procedures and the yield guidelines are important factors that affecting safety factor through strength reduction. Taking a certain complex slope for an example,through ANSYS-ADINA and ANSYS-FLAC interface program,a mesh model of ADINA,ANSYS and FLAC is established to overcome the grid coefficient on the safety factor. M-C and D-P criteria are respectively selected in the calculation. The following conclusions have been drawn:relative to the D-P criteria,the safety factor is smaller using the M-C criteria; for a series of D-P criteria,the safety factors by the exterior angle point circle D-P and inscribed circle D-P corresponds to the upper and lower limits; for the same kinds of yield criteria,the safety factor is slightly larger with the finite difference method than that with the finite element method.
作者 陈星 李建林
出处 《水文地质工程地质》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第3期69-73,共5页 Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(90610029) 湖北省教育厅自然科学研究项目计划(Q20091301) 三峡大学青年基金项目(KJ2009A005)联合资助
关键词 强度折减 ADINA ANSYS FLAC Mohr-Coulumb DRUCKER-PRAGER Strength reduction ADINA ANSYS FLAC Mohr-Coulumb Drucker-Prager
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献62

共引文献2945

同被引文献70

引证文献8

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部