摘要
在肯定余秋雨散文总体实绩的基础上,笔者认为余先生在创作中有时采取了对历史事实过分轻佻的态度,在《山居笔记》中的《苏东坡突围》一文中,这种现象尤为严重与明显。在这篇文章中,作者对史实进行了彻底的改造,以适应"文化探讨"的创作目的的需要。这种现象,从一定侧面反映了文本与事实之间长久以来存在的矛盾,以及中国传统的"线性思维"模式在当今的延续。笔者本着实证的治学方针以及探讨切磋的精神,就以上问题进行初步的探讨。
On the whole, Yu Qiuyu's prose is worthy of affirmation. However, in my opinion, his attitude towards the truth of history seems a bit thick levity, especially in the article 《the breakout of Su Dongpo》. Actually, the author has downright rebuilt the historical fact for the sake of adapting to the needs of inventing. This phenomenon reflects a contradiction between text and reality to some extent. Meanwhile, it is also the continuance of Chinese tradition "linear thinking" mode. Therefore, I will do some elementary research on these problems according to the guideline of positivism and the spirit of exploring.
出处
《宝鸡文理学院学报(社会科学版)》
2010年第2期66-72,共7页
Journal of Baoji University of Arts and Sciences:Social Science Edition
关键词
余秋雨
《苏东坡突围》
乌台诗案
线性思维
Yu Qiuyu
《the breakout of Su Dongpo》
Wutai poem case
linear thinking