期刊文献+

多性状综合评定的秩和差测验方法 被引量:10

A Rank-Sum-Difference Testing Method for Multi-Trait Comprehensive Ranking
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】多性状综合评价的秩和测验方法,虽可对多性状评价对象进行综合排序,并测验各评价对象与其平均水平的差异显著性,但无法实现各评价对象两两之间的差异显著性测验。为此,本文研究多性状综合评价多重比较的统计测验方法。【方法】在"H0:各评价对象在各性状上的秩次随机分布"假设下,以秩和理论分布为基础,利用组合数学方法。【结果】进一步导出了多性状秩和差的理论分布,并据之给出了多性状综合评价秩和差测验的显著性临界值。【结论】通过秩和差测验,确定评价对象两两之间的差异显著性,从而实现评价对象间的多重比较。该方法操作简单,便于实际应用。 【Objective】 The former paper had proposed the rank-sum testing method for multi-trait comprehensive evaluation,which not only can make the multi-trait comprehensive ranking,but also test the significance of difference between evaluation objects and the average level. In this paper,a rank-sum-difference testing method for multi-trait comprehensive evaluation was studied to implement the multiple comparisons among evaluation objects. 【 Method 】 The theoretical distribution of rank-sum-difference,based on the theoretical distribution of rank-sum,was firstly deduced by using combinatorial mathematics. 【Result】 Furthermore,it was used to obtain the critical values for the rank-sum-difference testing in multi-trait comprehensive evaluation. 【Conclusion】 The proposed rank-sum-difference testing method is so simple and convenient that it can be easily used to realize multiple comparisons among various evaluation objects.
出处 《中国农业科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第10期2008-2015,共8页 Scientia Agricultura Sinica
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划("973"计划)项目(2006CB101700) 国家自然科学基金项目(30971846) 江苏省高校自然科学研究重大项目(09KJA210002)
关键词 综合评价 多重比较 秩和差测验 comprehensive evaluation multiple comparisons rank-sum-difference testing
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1王宗军.综合评价的方法、问题及其研究趋势[J].管理科学学报,1998,1(1):73-79. 被引量:236
  • 2Chankong V, Haimes Y Y. Multiple Objective Decision Making:Theory and Methodology. New York: Elsevier, 1983.
  • 3Steuer R E. Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986.
  • 4Kidd J B, Prabhu S P. A practical example of a multilattribute decision aiding technique. OMEGA International Journal of Management Science, 1990, 18(2): 139-149.
  • 5Lootsma F A, Mensch T C A, Vos F A. Multi-criteria analysis and budget reallocation in long-term research planning. European Journal of Operations Research, 1990, 47: 293-305.
  • 6Saaty T L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw Hill, 1980.
  • 7Saaty T L. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 1990, 48: 9-26.
  • 8Saaty T L, Hu G. Ranking by eigenvector versus other methods in the analytic hierarchy process. Applied Mathematics Letters, 1998, 11(4): 121-125.
  • 9Zadeh L A. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 1965, 8: 338-353.
  • 10贺仲雄.模糊数学及其应用.天津:天津科学技术出版社,1988.

二级参考文献68

共引文献597

同被引文献142

引证文献10

二级引证文献105

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部