摘要
《韩国宪法法院法》第68条第1项明确将普通法院的判决排除在宪法诉愿的审查对象之外,对于禁止裁判诉愿的此项规定,韩国学界聚讼纷纷。合宪论与违宪论之间形成了四大争点:禁止裁判诉愿是否符合宪法诉愿的本质、是否属于立法形成自由,司法行为侵犯基本权利的机率与审级制度对其控制能力是否使得裁判诉愿不再必要,裁判诉愿是否包含在裁判请求权之内,是否导致第四审法院的形成以及案件负担的激增。四个回合的对决式过招中,韩国宪法诉愿制度的内涵,渐次清晰地呈现出来。
Article 68,paragraph 1 of 'Constitutional Court Law' of Korea excludes judgement from the constitutional complaint,which triggers much controversy in Korean academia.The disputes between supporters and their opponents mainly focus on four points as follow:1) Does judgement complaint conform with the nature of constitutional complaint? 2) Does the low proportion of infringe on fundamental rights make it unnecessary? 3) Is it part of the right of access to justice? 4) Does it lead to a fourth trial level,or the rapidly increasing of caseload?
出处
《浙江社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第5期41-45,共5页
Zhejiang Social Sciences
关键词
宪法诉愿
裁判诉愿
韩国
宪法法院
Constitutional Complaint,Constitutional Complaint against Judgement,Korean,Constitutional Court
