期刊文献+

反应堆冗余泵组的相关动态可靠性 被引量:1

Dependent dynamic reliability of redundancy pump group in nuclear reactor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了解决反应堆冗余泵组中相关性(包括泵的温备用、共因失效以及止回阀组同时工作)相互重叠的问题,应用动态可靠性框图(DRBD)建立了冗余泵组的相关动态模型.以冗余泵组为整体,比较分析了其在4种不同相关性情况下的系统故障概率变化,通过状态转移方程求得动态数值解并绘制了曲线图.实验结果表明,多种相关性重叠在冗余泵组中起着重要作用,以DRBD建模为基础,确定并量化各相关因子之间的关系是分析冗余系统相关性的一种有效方法. For solving the problem that the dependency overlap of redundancy pump group in nuclear reactor,including warm standby and common cause failure(CCF) of pumps as well as simultaneous operating of check valve group,the dynamic reliability block diagram(DRBD) was used to establish the dependent dynamic model of redundancy pump group.With taking the redundancy pump group as a whole,the failure probability changes of redundancy pump group in four different dependencies were analyzed and compared.The dynamic numerical solution and corresponding curves were obtained by state-transferring equation.The experiment results show that the dependency overlap is very important in redundancy pump group.It is an effective method to analyze the dependency of redundancy system by determining and quantifying the relations between various dependency factors based on DRBD modeling.
出处 《沈阳工业大学学报》 EI CAS 2010年第2期171-176,共6页 Journal of Shenyang University of Technology
基金 海军工程大学自然科学基金资助项目(HGDJJ006)
关键词 相关性 动态可靠性框图 共因失效 温备用 冗余泵组 动态可靠性 多状态 反应堆 dependency dynamic reliability block diagram common cause failure warm standby redundancy pump group dynamic reliability multi-state nuclear reactor
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Mosleh A, Fleming K, Parry G, et al. Procedures for treating common cause failures in safety and reliability studies [ R ]. Washington: U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CR- 4780,1988.
  • 2Mosleh A, Rasmuson D M, Marshall F M. Guidelines on modeling common-cause failures in probabilistic risk assessment [R]. Washington: U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CR-5485,1998.
  • 3谢里阳,李翠玲.相关系统失效概率的次序统计量模型及共因失效原因分析[J].机械强度,2005,27(1):66-71. 被引量:18
  • 4沈祖培,唐辉.有共因失效的系统可靠性的GO法分析[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2006,46(6):829-832. 被引量:25
  • 5Distefano S, Puliafito A. Dependability modeling and analysis in dynamic system[ C ]//Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium. Long Beach:IEEE International ,2007:230 - 237.
  • 6Distefano S, Puliafito A. Dynamic reliability block diagrams VS dynamic fault trees [J]. IEEE, 2007 ( 1 ) : 71 -76.
  • 7Distefano S, Scarpa M, Puliafito A. Modeling distributed computing system reliability with DRBD [ J ]. IEEE,2006(10) : 106 - 115.
  • 8Distefano S, Xing L D. A new approach to modeling the system reliability: dynamic reliability block diagrams [ C ]//Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Reliability & Maintainability Symposium. Newport Beach. IEEE International, 2006 : 189 - 195.
  • 9Distefano S, Puliafito A. Dynamic reliability block diagrams VS dynamic fault trees [ C ]//Proceedings of the 53nd Annual Reliability & Maintainability Symposium. Orlando: IEEE International ,2007 : 71 - 76.
  • 10Marshall F M, Rasmuson D M, Mosleh A. Commoncause failure parameter estimations [ R ]. Washington DC. U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/ CR-5497,1998.

二级参考文献18

  • 1谢民育.次序统计量线性组合之分布及其在可靠性统计中的应用[J].应用数学,1989,2(1):53-60. 被引量:4
  • 2Levitin G. Incorporating common-cause failures into non-repairable multi-state series -parallel system analysis. IEEE Transaction on Reliability, 2001, 50(4): 380~385.
  • 3Hughes R P. A new approach to common cause failure. Reliability Engineering, 1987, 17: 211~236.
  • 4Mosleh A, Parry G W, Zikria A F. An approach to the analysis of common cause failure data for plant-specific application. Nuclear Eng. and Design, 1994,150: 25~47.
  • 5Hauptmanns U. The multi-class binominal failure rate model. Reliability Eng. and System Safety, 1996, 53: 85~96.
  • 6Kvam P H,Miller J G. Common cause failure prediction using data mapping. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2002, 76: 273~278.
  • 7Xie L Y. A knowledge based multi-dimension discrete CCF model. Nuclear Eng. Design, 1998, 183: 107~116.
  • 8Gupta R C. Reliability of a k out of n system of components sharing a common environment. Applied Mathematics Letters,2002,15:837~844.
  • 9Goble W M,Brombacher A C,Bukowski J V,et al. Using stress-strain simulations to characterize common cause. In:Mosleh A R, Bari A,eds. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM4), New York: Springer, 1998. 519~403.
  • 10黄祥瑞.可靠性工程[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1995.

共引文献42

同被引文献52

  • 1亨利EJ.可靠性工程与风险分析[M].北京:原子能出版社,1988..
  • 2DEVOOGHT J, SMIDTS C. Probabilistic reac- tor dynamics- I : The theory of continuous event trees[J]. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 1992 (111) : 229-240.
  • 3DEVOOGHT J, SMIDTS C. Probabilistic reactor dynarracs-Ⅲ. A framework for time-dependent in- teraction between operator and reactor during a tran- sient involving human error[J]. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 1992(112): 101-113.
  • 4SMIDTS C, DEVOOGHT J. Probabilistic reac- tor dynamics-Ⅱ : A Monte Carlo study of a fast reactor transient[J]. Nuclear Science and Engi- neering, 1992(111) : 241-256.
  • 5SMIDTS C. Probabilistic reactor dynamics-IV: An example of man/machine interaction[J]. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 1992(112) : 114-126.
  • 6DEVOOGHT J, SMIDTS C. Probabilistic dynamics as a tool for dynamic PSA[J]. Reliability Engineer- ing and System Safety, 1996(52) .. 185-196.
  • 7IZQUIERDO J M, MELENDEZ E, DEVOOGHT J. Relationship between probabilistic dynamics and event trees[J]. Reliability Engineering and Sys- tem Safety, 1996(52): 197-209.
  • 8DEVOOGHT J, TOMBUYES B. Aggregation methods for reliability and availability calcula- tions [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1996(51): 23-34.
  • 9LABEAU P E. A method of benchmarking for two-state problems of probabilistic dynamics[J]. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 1995 (119) : 212-217.
  • 10DEVOOGHT J, LABEAU P E. Moments of the distributions in probabilistic dynamics[J]. Ann Nucl Energy, 1995, 22(2): 97-108.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部