期刊文献+

软土结构性及结构破损机理 被引量:4

Structural Characteristics and the Damage Mechanism of Soft Clay
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过对漳州和黄石地区2种结构性软土进行单向与等向压缩试验,根据原状样和重塑样的压缩曲线确定了先期固结压力和结构强度.研究表明,漳州软土结构应力比在1.1~1.2之间,黄石软土在1.2~1.3之间,说明在沉积过程中产生的结构屈服压力与上覆压力基本成正比.结构强度随埋深、试验的加荷间隔、加荷时间的增加而增大;由单向压缩试验曲线得到的结构强度大于等向压缩试验曲线得到的结构强度;卸载再加载过程对结构性强弱影响不大.计算得到漳州软土结构破损系数为17.7%,黄石软土结构破损系数为14%,说明黄石软土结构性略强于漳州软土.从微观角度解释了土的结构破损主要是由颗粒间的连接方式的改变与孔隙变化所引起的. Zhangzhou and Huangshi soft clays were tested under uni-directional and isotonic compression loading. The pre-consolidation pressure and structural strength of the soft clays were determined from an analysis of the compression curves of both reconstituted and original soils. The structural stress ratio was found to be 1.1~1.2 for Zhangzhou and 1.2~1.3 for Huangshi clays. This shows that the yield pressure produced during the deposition process and the overburden pressure are proportional. Structural strength increased along with burial depth, loading interval and loading time. Unidirectional compression tests give a structural strength greater than the isotonic compression tests. Re-loading after unloading did not have a large effect on structural strength. The structural damage coefficients of Zhangzhou and Huangshi clays are 17.7 and 14 percent, respectively. From a microscopic perspective the damage was caused mainly by changes in the connection between soil particles and by changes in the pore structure.
出处 《中国矿业大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第3期373-379,共7页 Journal of China University of Mining & Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(40572153)
关键词 土结构性 结构强度 结构破损系数 结构破损机理 soil structure structural strength structural damage coefficient structure damage mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献162

共引文献1227

同被引文献43

  • 1谈云志,孔令伟,郭爱国,万智,张华.压实红黏土的持水性能与机制分析[J].岩土力学,2011,32(S1):334-338. 被引量:19
  • 2孙德安,高游.不同制样方法非饱和土的持水特性研究[J].岩土工程学报,2015,37(1):91-97. 被引量:24
  • 3孙德安,高游,刘文捷,韦昌富,张升.红黏土的土水特性及其孔隙分布[J].岩土工程学报,2015,37(2):351-356. 被引量:45
  • 4魏星,黄茂松.天然结构性黏土的各向异性边界面模型[J].岩土工程学报,2007,29(8):1224-1229. 被引量:18
  • 5Mitchell J K. Fundamentals of Soil Behavior [ M ]. New York: Wiley, 1976.
  • 6Schmertmann J H. The undisturbed consolidation beha-viorofclay[J]. Transport, ASCE, 1955, 120: 1201 - 1227.
  • 7Burland J B. On the compressibility and shear strength of natural clay[ J ]. Gotechnique, 1990, 40 (3): 329-378.
  • 8Graham J, Li E C C. Comparison of natural and remolded plastic clay [ J ]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1985, 111 (7) : 865 - 881.
  • 9Hong Z S, Song Y, Liu S L, et al. Comparison in undrained shear strength between undisturbed and remolded Ariake clays[ J] Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2006, 132 (2) :272 -275.
  • 10Casagrande A, The determination of pre-consolidation load and its practical significance [ C ]//Proc. of 1st Interna-tional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Cambridge, England, 1936, 60 - 68.

引证文献4

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部