期刊文献+

京郊河溪岸边带生态恢复适宜性评价 被引量:7

Suitability Assessment for Ecological Restoration of Rural Riparian Zone in Beijing City
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用模糊概率评价模型,构建岸边带生态恢复适宜性评价指标体系,对北京郊区安达木河岸边带进行了生态恢复适宜性评价,并将适宜性分为:完全不适宜(Ⅰ),低度适宜(Ⅱ),适宜(Ⅲ),非常适宜(Ⅳ)共4个等级。结果表明,安达木河岸边带生态恢复适宜性总体处于Ⅱ和Ⅲ等级之间的过渡阶段,各等级岸边带所占比例分别为10.0%,30.6%,26.7%和11.7%。并在分析安达木河生态恢复适宜性评价图的基础上,针对处于不同适宜性等级的岸边带提出了相应的生态恢复建议。 By means of fuzzy probability assessment model, an assessment indicator system was built to assess the suitability for ecological restoration of Andamu River. The suitability for ecological restoration was divided into four grades: not suitable, low suitability, suitable, and very suitable. Results showed that the total suitability for ecological restoration of Andamu River was between the low suitability and the suitable grade. The proportion of four grades that various types of riparian take up was 10. 0%, 30. 6%, 26. 7%, and 11.7%, respectively. On the base of subsection assessment sketch of riparian zone ecological restoration suitability, ecological restoration suggestions for each grade of riparian zone were brbught forward.
出处 《水土保持通报》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第2期46-50,共5页 Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"北京地区河溪自然性评价及近自然恢复机理研究"(40771128) 国际科技合作项目(2009DFA32490)
关键词 岸边带 生态恢复 适宜性评价 安达木河 riparian zone ecological restoration suitability assessment Andamu River
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1杨胜天,王雪蕾,刘昌明,盛浩然,李茜.岸边带生态系统研究进展[J].环境科学学报,2007,27(6):894-905. 被引量:69
  • 2Naiman R J, Decamps H, McClain M E. Riparia: Ecol ogy, conservation, and management of streamside corn munities[M]. London, Great Britain: Elsevier Academ ic Press, 2005: 28-37.
  • 3Gregory S V, Swanson F J, McKee W A, et al. An ecosystem perspective on riparian zones [J]. Bioscience, 1991,41(8), 34-42.
  • 4Quinn J M. Riparian management classification for Canter- bury streams (No. NIWA client report HAM2003-064) [J]. National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, 2003 , 16(2) : 139-147.
  • 5夏继红,严忠民.生态河岸带的概念及功能[J].水利水电技术,2006,37(5):14-17. 被引量:68
  • 6诸葛亦斯,刘德富,黄钰铃.生态河流缓冲带构建技术初探[J].水资源与水工程学报,2006,17(2):63-67. 被引量:45
  • 7Boone K J, Beschta R L, Otting N, et al. An ecological perspective of riparian and stream restoration in the western United States[J]. Fisheries, 1997, 22(5) : 12-24.
  • 8Morten L P, Nikolai F. Restoration of Skjern River and its valley: Short-term effects on river habitats, macrophytes and macroinvertebrates[J]. Ecological engineering, 2007,30.145-156.
  • 9董哲仁.河流生态修复的尺度格局和模型[J].水利学报,2006,37(12):1476-1481. 被引量:39
  • 10高甲荣,王芳,朱继鹏,王敏.河溪生态系统自然性评价指标体系[J].中国水土保持科学,2006,4(5):66-70. 被引量:19

二级参考文献172

共引文献595

同被引文献80

引证文献7

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部