期刊文献+

神·人·法:纠纷解决模式从权威到规则的演进 被引量:6

God,Human and Law:The Evolution of Dispute Resolution from Authority Discretion to Rule of Rules
下载PDF
导出
摘要 纠纷解决自古就是人类社会所面对的一项深刻主题。综观人类历史,纠纷解决大抵经历了一个从权威到规则的过程。神明裁判是几乎所有初民社会都曾广泛使用的纠纷解决手段,这也成为最早的纠纷解决的权威审判方式。随着社会的发展和生存经验的不断积累,神明的权威逐渐隐去,而代之以氏族首领这一新的权威,在纠纷解决过程中发挥着重要的作用,也进而成为最早的法官。在纠纷解决过程中所形成的习惯因其被普遍承认而固定下来,成为规则,规则也逐渐限制了权威的自由评断,成为纠纷解决的依据。 Dispute solving has been a profound theme of human society ever since ancient times. A review of human history reveals that dispute resolution has undergone a shift from authority discretion to rule of rules. Divine judgment which was widely used in almost all of the primitive societies represents the earliest authority judgment form in dispute resolution. With the development of human society and the constant accumulation of experiences, the authoritativeness of divine judgment faded out gradually, replaced by a new authority the clan chief who played an important role in dispute resolution and was regarded as the earliest judge. Customs which were universally recognized and well established in the process of dispute settlement were handed down and became rules which have gradually set limits to the free judgment of authorities and have served as the basis for dispute resolution.
出处 《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第3期37-45,共9页 Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 司法部“法治建设与法学理论研究”基金资助项目“村民自治法律制度研究”(03SFB2005)的阶段性成果
关键词 权威 规则 神明裁判 规则之治 authority rules divine judgment rule of rules
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献12

  • 1马士岭.知识的概念分析与信念[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005(2):90-97. 被引量:5
  • 2[美]埃尔曼.比较法律文化[M].北京:三联书店,1990.263.
  • 3[美]霍贝尔.初民的法律[M].周勇译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1993.
  • 4[美]路易斯·亨利·摩尔根.古代社会(上)[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997.
  • 5Adamson Hoebel.The Law of Primitive Man[M].New York:Atheneum,1983:24;84-87; 84-87; 84-87.
  • 6Lowie.Incorporeal Property in Primitive Society[J].Yale Law,1928,(2).
  • 7Willam Seagle.Primitive Law and Professor Malinowski[J].American Anthropologist,(New Series),1937,(2).
  • 8Leopold Pospisil.Social Change and Primitive Law:Consequence of a Papuan Legal Case[J].American Anthropologist(New Series),1958,(5).
  • 9Roland G.Usher.Primitive Law and the Negro[J].The Journal of Negro History,1919,(1).
  • 10Max Barotseland.The Judicial Process among the Barotes of Northern Phodesia[M].Manchester:Manchester University Press,1955:357.

共引文献4

同被引文献134

引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部