1Coff,R."When Competitive Advantage doesn‘tlead to Performance:The Resource-based View and StakeholderBargaining Power"[].Organization Science.1999
2Hair,J.F,Black,W.C,Babin,B.J,Anderson,R.E,Tatham,R.L.Multivariate Data Analysis[]..2006
3Ulf Andersson,Mats Forsgren,Ulf Holm.The Strategic Impact of External Networks: Subsidiary Performance and Competence Development in The Multinational Corporation[].Strategic Management Journal.2002
3RUGMAN A, VERBEKE A. Subsidiary specific advantages in multi- national enterprises [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001 (22) : 237 - 250.
4BIRKINSHAW JM, HOOD N, JONSSON S. Building firm - specific advantages in multinational corporations : The role of the subsidiary in- itiative [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1998, 19 ( 3 ) : 221 -241.
6ANNE -WIL HARZING, NIELS NOORDERHAVEN. Knowledge flows in mncs: An empirical test and extension of Gupta and Govin- darajan' s typology of subsidiary roles [ J ]. International Business Review, 2006, 15 (3): 195-214.
7CIABUSCHI F, HOLM U, MARTIN O M. Subsidiary ambidexterity and the innovation development and transfer relationship [ C ]. San Di- ego : Academy of International Business Annual Conference, 2009.
8MUDAMBIR, HOLM U, HALLIN C, et al. A multi - dimensional analysis of subsidiaries" coropetence development within the MNC [ C ]. San Diego: Academy of International Business Annual Conference, 2009.
9BLOMKVIST K. Diffusion patterns of new technological capabilities - the difference between green field and acquired competence - creating subsidiaries [ C]. San Diego: Academy of International Business An- nual CmLference, 2009.
10Ahuja, G., Lampert, C. M., Tandon, V., 2008, "Moving Beyond Schumpeter: Management Research on the Determinants of Technological Innovation" [J], The Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 2, No. 1:1-98.
