摘要
"安全带法"(驾车时强制要求系安全带的规定)已经是一种全球性的法律,其广泛存在在很大程度上源于对安全带能大幅度降低机动车乘坐人的伤亡率的确信。但"风险补偿"理论论证了安全带法并不能使道路交通更安全,大量的实证研究也证实了这一点。尽管有安全带更安全的神话已经破灭,但各国的立法者对此却无动于衷,或许这可归因于法学的保守性、制度的路径依赖、社会选择的影响以及法学一定程度的不自足性。由此生发开去,立法活动与社会科学知识的关系更加值得人们深思。
Seat-belt law lmandatory seat belt while driving carss nowadays has become a worldwide legislation. Its popularity is largely due to the belief that the seat-belt law could greatly reduce the casualty rate of motor velide thawel. However,the theory of Risk Compensation has proved that the seat-belt law cannot make the road travel safer,so do a large mount of empirical studies. Despite the myth of a safer seat-belt has dashed there has been no response of legislators in all countries,which may be attributed to the conservatism of law,the path dependence of institution,the influence of social choice and some not self-insufficiency of law. More important to mention,the relationship of legislation activity and social science knowledge worths further thinking.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第3期133-140,共8页
Law and Social Development
基金
2008年福建省社会科学规划项目"和谐社会中基于社会正义的政府规制研究"(2008B2077)
关键词
安全带法
风险补偿理论
社会科学知识
seat-belt law
risk compensation theory
social science knowledge