摘要
目的:探讨剖宫产腹壁缝合的临床意义。方法:将产妇分两组,改良组70例缝合腹膜,皮肤皮内缝合。对照组100例,不缝腹膜,皮肤外缝三大针。结果:改良组术后腹壁伤口渗出液少,住院时间短,两组比较有显著差异。结论:改良组术后恢复快,粘连少,腹壁伤口渗出液少,腹部伤口平整、疤痕轻、住院时间短、医疗费用低值得推广。
Objective:To compare the different abdominal wall sutures in cesarean section. Methods:The pregnant women were divided into two groups. The improved group (70 cases) received peritoneal suture and intradermal suture and the control group (100 cases) was performed 3 stitches of external skin suture without suturing peritoneum. Results:Wound exudation in the improved group was less,and the hospital stay time was shorter compared with the control group. There was significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion:The improved suture has rapid postoperative recovery,fewer adhesions,less abdominal wound exudation with abdominal smoothing wound,slight scar,short hospital stay and lower medical cost,which is worth promoting.
出处
《现代医药卫生》
2010年第9期1306-1307,共2页
Journal of Modern Medicine & Health
关键词
剖宫产
粘连
渗出液
Cesarean section
Adhesion
Exudation