米隆临床多轴问卷第三版的信效度研究

A Study of the Reliability and Validity of Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory Ⅲ (MCMI-Ⅲ)

目的:引入米隆临床多轴问卷第三版(Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory Ⅲ,MCMI-Ⅲ),初步检验其信效度。方法:用MCMI-Ⅲ对病例组被试及正常人进行施测。部分病例组被试同时完成SAS、SDS、HAMA、HAMD;部分病例组被试7-14天后完成重测。结果:总量表的Cronbachα系数、分半信度分别为0.96、0.92,分量表的α系数及分半信度均值分别为0.72,0.71;重测信度均值为0.71;绝大多数条目的题总相关达显著(P<0.05)或极显著性水平(P<0.01);绝大多数分量表之间的相关显著;SAS、SDS、HAMA、HAMD与MCMI-Ⅲ相应分量表的相关均达到极显著性水平(P<0.01);病例组与对照组在绝大多数分量表的得分差异显著。结论:MCMI-Ⅲ符合心理测量学要求,具有良好的信度和效度。

Objective： To translate Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory Ⅲ （MCMI-Ⅲ） into Chinese, and then test its reliability and validity. Methods： MCMI-Ⅲ was administered to patients with mental disorders and normal people. Some subjects completed SAS, SDS, HAMA and HAMD simultaneously. 7-14 days later, some subjects completed the Chinese version of MCMI-Ⅲ again. Results： Cronbach’s alpha and the split-half reliability of MCMI-Ⅲ was 0.957 and 0.919, respectively. The mean Cronbach’s alpha, split -half and test -retest reliability of the subscales were 0.72, 0.70, 0.71 respectively. Most of the items correlated significantly （P 〈0.05,P〈 0.01） with corresponding subscales. Most of the subscales correlated significantly （P〈0.05,P〈0.01） with each other; SAS, SDS, HAMA and HAMD correlated significantly （P〈 0.05,P〈 0.01） with corresponding subscales. Most of the subscales’ scores of the patient group were significantly different （P〈 0.05,P〈 0.01） from the control group （n =45）. Conclusion： The Chinese version of MCMI -Ⅲ meets psychometric criterions, and it has good reliability and validity.