期刊文献+

边缘型人格障碍大学生的客体关系特点 被引量:2

Object Relation of Borderline Personality Disorder in Thematic Appearance Test
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:运用主题统觉测验探索边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的客体关系特点。方法:对某师范大学新生施测PDQ-4+问卷,选取边缘型得分7分以上者进行SCID-Ⅱ结构化访谈,共确诊62人,从中按边缘型得分由高到低选取30名被试作为BPD组。从边缘型得分小于2的群体中,由低到高选取30名被试作为非BPD组,比较两组在社会认知和客体关系量表(SCORS)四个维度上的得分。结果:两组被试在客体关系表征复杂性、情感基调和社会归因三个维度上存在显著差异,情感投入与道德发展没有显著差异。情感基调这一变量能够预测边缘型得分。结论:BPD组大学生的客体关系四维度中,表征复杂性、情感基调和社会归因三个维度发展水平明显低于非BPD组大学生。 Objective: To explore the object relation in the college students with borderline personality disorder(BPD) by thematic appearance test (TAT). Methods: The result of the social cognitive and object relation scale (SCORS) of BPD students was compared with that of the non-BPD students. Results: The BPD students got significantly lower scores in complexity of representations of people, affect-tone of relationship paradigms, and understanding of social causality. But there was no significant difference in the capacity for emotional investment in relationships and moral standards. Conclusion: The object relation of BPD students is different from that of the non-BPD students. The non-BPD students develop better in complexity of representations of people, affect -tone of relationship paradigms, and understanding of social causality.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 2010年第1期41-43,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地2006年度重大项目(06JJD880021)
关键词 边缘型人格障碍 社会认知和客体关系量表 主题统觉测验 Borderline personality disorder Social cognitive and object relation scale Thematic appearance test
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Association, 1994. 219-227.
  • 2于宏华,傅文青,姚树桥,曹文胜,陈晓阳,张茜.B群人格障碍与童年期被虐待经历的关系[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2006,20(6):388-391. 被引量:15
  • 3Zanarini MC, Yong L, Frankenburg FR, et al. Severity of reported childhood sexual abuse and its relationship to severity of borderline psychopathology and psychosocial impairment among borderline inpatients. J Nerv Ment Dis, 2002, 190:381-87.
  • 4Sidney RO, Robert MK. Object relations and physical abuse: A TAT analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1995, 64(3): 552 -568.
  • 5Westen D, Lohr N, Silk K, et al. Object relations and social cognition in borderlines major depressives and normals:A thematic apperception test analysis. A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1991, 2(4): 355-364.
  • 6Nigg JT, Silk KR, Westen D, Lohr NE, et al. Object representations in the early memories of sexually abused borderline patients. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 1991, 148:864-869.
  • 7项锦晶,申荷永,李江雪.边缘型人格障碍的欲求-压力分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2009,23(5):340-344. 被引量:4
  • 8宋东峰,傅文青,孔明,孙晓宇.大学生边缘型人格障碍患病率调查[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2009,17(3):342-344. 被引量:5
  • 9杨蕴萍,沈东郁,王久英,杨坚.人格障碍诊断问卷(PDQ-4+)在中国应用的信效度研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2002,10(3):165-168. 被引量:180
  • 10戴云飞,肖泽萍,王振,张海音,陈珏,邹政,何燕玲,赵介城,张明园.人格障碍诊断问卷(SCID-Ⅱ)第2版的信度和效度[J].上海精神医学,2006,18(1):1-4. 被引量:55

二级参考文献58

共引文献234

同被引文献33

  • 1阎燕燕,孟宪璋.童年创伤和虐待与成年精神障碍[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(2):208-209. 被引量:46
  • 2黄群明,赵幸福,林汉民,刘永忠,尹祚平,周云飞,李龙飞.356名高中生的儿童期虐待问卷调查[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2006,14(1):97-99. 被引量:27
  • 3于宏华,傅文青,姚树桥,曹文胜,陈晓阳,张茜.B群人格障碍与童年期被虐待经历的关系[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2006,20(6):388-391. 被引量:15
  • 4卢元镇.体育社会学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2005:72.
  • 5马启伟主编.体育心理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2004,(136)
  • 6WHO. WHO recognizes child abuse as a public health problem [OL]. http ://www. who. int/ilff- pr - 1999/en/Pr99 -20. Html.
  • 7Raimer S S, Raimer B G. Family violence, child abuse, andanogenital- warts [ J ]. Arch Dcrmatol, 1992,128 (6) :842-844.
  • 8Gratz K L. Risk factors for and functions of deliberate Self - Harm: An empirical and conceptual review[ J]. Clinical Psychology:Science and Practice, 2003,10 ( 2 ) : 192-205.
  • 9Briere J N, EUiott D M. Immediate and long - term impacts of child sexual abuse[ J]. The future of children, 1994:54-69.
  • 10Browne A, Finkelhor D. Impact of child sexual abuse : A review of the research [ J ]. Psychological bulletin, 1986,99 ( 1 ) : 66 -77.

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部