摘要
从来没有不为任何目的服务之工具,也没有不借助于一定手段之目的。文艺在本体论上为自由解放之目的与为之斗争的政治工具性统一。文艺目的性与工具性之间的转换是随着历史发展不同阶段变化的,它们各自不可能脱离这种二元对立相互割裂孤立存在。文艺在不同的历史阶段,总是在宗教目的、道德目的、政治目的以及市场商业目的之间表现出不同的工具性,一旦沦为某些权力与金钱的工具,而与历史的方向相背,文艺不仅在政治上背离了"人学"目的,在审美上也陷入公式化与概念化泥淖。文艺的工具价值是艺术生产所创造的人的精神财富和人的自我价值实现的一种形态,始终指向人的自由解放之终极目的。
There has been neither any instrument that does not service the purpose,nor any purpose that does not depend on the instrument. Art,in the ontological theory,is an integration of the purpose of free liberation and the political instrument for the struggle. The shift between its purposiveness and instrumentality changes with the different stages of historical development,which can not exist alone without such binary opposition. At different historical stages,art always represents different instrumentalities among religious,moral,political and commercial purposes. Once art degrades itself as an instrument of privilege and money,thus deviating from the historical direction,it will be politically separated from the purpose of "human study" and be aesthetically stuck in the morass of formula and definition. The instrumental value of art is a form of human spiritual wealth and self value realization created by artistic production,with the ultimate purpose of human free liberation.
出处
《艺术百家》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第3期69-75,共7页
Hundred Schools In Arts
基金
中国社会科学院老年科研基金(2009-2012年度)"美学与文艺学的‘后学科’重建问题"阶段性成果之一
关键词
艺术生产
艺术消费
文艺理论
文艺学
美学
本体论
目的性
审美
工具性
自由
发展
artistic production
artistic consumption
art theory
art study
aesthetics
ontology
purposiveness
aesthetic
instrumentality
freedom
development