期刊文献+

基于控制权私利的投资效率与挤占效应研究 被引量:10

Study on efficiency of investment and extrusion effect based on the private benefit of control
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于控制权私利动机驱动资本投资的理论阐释,本文在上市公司实际控制人和部门经理的两层代理框架下,构建了企业内部经营者攫取控制权私利所引致的非效率投资行为模型。模型研究和扩展分析表明:(1)企业生产部门的低效性引发了经营者通过攫取私利增加收益选择权的动机;(2)在国有股权虚置和内部人控制显著的治理结构下,实际控制人和部门经营者私利的一致性、股权激励机制的弱效性以及薪酬管制的制度刚性,使得上市公司实际控制人更多采用融资资金对经营者攫取私利的收益选择权进行补偿,引发了企业的过度投资行为;(3)低效部门经营者的攫取私利动机和实际控制人补偿行为的相互作用,不仅导致了企业投资的效率低下,而且使得投资资金在高效部门和低效部门之间的配置产生挤占。 Based on the causation of the capital investment driven by the private benefit of control,an inefficient investment behavior model leaded by the insider snatching private benefit of control is constructed under a uniform two-tiered analysis frame.By expanding the model,the investigative results are gained.(1)The branch inefficacy in the corporation drives the motivation that snatches private benefit of control for increasing profitable option;(2)Under the absence of state property right and the prominent insider control in the corporation governance structure,the fact that uses capital by the state proxy to compensate the exterior option of private benefit of control leads to the overinvestment behavior due to the coherence of private benefit between controller and manager,the inefficacy of stock ownership incentive mechanism,and the rigidity of salary management;(3)The mutual effect of the snatching private benefit and compensating behavior causes not only the overinvestment,but also the extrusion effect of capital allocation between the efficient branch and the inefficient branch.
作者 郝颖 刘星
出处 《科研管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第3期165-170,175,共7页 Science Research Management
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70772100 70802067 70771118) 国家社科基金项目(08JY154) 重庆大学青年骨干教师创新能力培育基金重点项目 重庆大学人才引进基金资助
关键词 控制权私利 资本投资 挤占效应 private benefit of control capital investment extrusion effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Demsetz, Harold and K. Lehn, The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences[ J]. Journal of Political Economy ,1985(93) : 1155 - 1177.
  • 2Shleifer, A. ,and R. Vishny, A Survey of Corporate Governance[J]. Journal of Finance, 1997(52) : 737 -783.
  • 3Pagano, Marco, and Alisa Roel. The choice of stock ownership structure: agency costs, monitoring, and the decision to go public [ J ]. Quarterly Journal of Economic, 1998 ( 113 ) : 187 - 226.
  • 4Claessens, S. , S. Djankov, and L. H. P. Lang, The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations[ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2000(58) : 81 -112.
  • 5Johnson S. R, La Porta F. , Lopaz- De- Silanes A, Shleifer: Tunnelling[J]. American Economic Review,2000, (90) : 22 -27.
  • 6LaPorta, R. , F. Lopez - de - Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny: Corporate Ownership Around the World[ J]. Journal of Finance, 1999(54) : 471 -517.
  • 7Tim Baldenius: Delegated Investment Decisions and Private Benefits of Control[ J ]. The Accounting Review, 2003 (78) : 909 930.
  • 8Wu, Xueping and wangzheng, Equity financing in a Myers Majluf framework with private benefits of control[ J]. Journal of Corporate Finance , 2005( 11 ) : 915 -945.
  • 9Aldemon and Michael J. The Specification and Power of Tests to Detect Abnormal Changes in Corporate Investment [ J ]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2006(12) :738 -760.
  • 10Andrea L E. , Adriano A. Managerial Incentives, Capital Reallocation, and the Business Cycle [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2008 ( 87 ) : 177 - 199.

二级参考文献177

共引文献3893

同被引文献147

引证文献10

二级引证文献114

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部