期刊文献+

亚热带地区树叶凋落物在流水和静水环境中的淋溶规律 被引量:15

Leaching process of leaf litter in running water and lentic water in subtropical China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了解亚热带地区水体中树叶凋落物在分解初期的淋溶规律,比较研究了广州地区8种常见树种的树叶凋落物在静水和流水环境中淋溶量的变化。结果表明,在第1d内,8种树叶无论在静水还是流水环境下干重损失率均显著高于其他时段(P〈0.05),但不同树种在淋溶量的大小上存在差异,其中以质地柔软、革质化程度低的人面子树叶干重淋溶率最大(流水中:27.0%;静水中:24.2%);质地坚硬、革质化程度高的竹柏树叶淋溶率最小(流水中:9.8%;静水中:8.0%)。第2d和第3d,8种树叶凋落物的干重损失率无显著差异,表明淋溶阶段趋于结束。综上结果表明,亚热带地区的树叶凋落物在静水环境和流水环境中的淋溶阶段均主要出现在第1天。 To investigate the leaching process in the prophase of leaf litter decomposition in water in subtropical region of China, we studied the leaching mass losses of leaf litter of 8 common species in Guangzhou in lentic or running water. The results showed that the rate of dry mass loss of leaf litter of all species whether in lentic water or in running water were significantly higher in the first day than in other days (P〈0.05), but the difference of leaf species might lead to different leaching mass losses. The leaching rate of Dracontomelon duperreanum whose leaves are soft and thin-coriaceous was significantly higher than those of other species (27.0% lost in running water, 24.2% in lentic water), and the leaching rate of Podocarpus nagi whose leaves are rigid and coriaceous was the lowest (9.8% in running water, 8.0% in lentic water). There was no significant difference in the rate of dry mass loss in the 2nd day and 3rd day, which suggested the leaching might finish. Summarily, the leaching phase of leaf litter in subtropical zone lasted out for one day whether in lentic water or in running water.
出处 《生态科学》 CSCD 2010年第1期50-55,共6页 Ecological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(30270279),国家自然科学基金(40871242)
关键词 树叶凋落物 淋溶 树叶种类 静水 流水 Leaf litter leaching leaf species lentic water running water
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Petersen R C,Cummins K W.Leaf processing in a woodland stream[J].Freshwater Biology,1974,4:343-368.
  • 2Webster J R,Benfield E F.Vascular plant breakdown in freshwater ecosystems[J].Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1986,17:567-594.
  • 3Gessner M O,Chauvet E,Dobson M.A perspective on leaf litter breakdown in streams[J].Oikos,1999,85:377-384.
  • 4Ibrahima A,Biyanzi P,Halima M.Changes in organic compounds during leaf litter leaching:laboratory experiment on eight plant species of the Sudano-guinea Savannas of Ngaoundere,Cameroon[J].Forest,2007,4:407-417.
  • 5Nykvist N.Leaching and decomposition of litter.I.Experiments on leaf litter of Fraxinus excelsior[J].Oikos,1959,10:190-211.
  • 6Nykvist N.Leaching and decomposition of water-soluble organic substances from different types of leaf and needle litter[J].Studia Forestalia Suecica,1963,3:1-31.
  • 7Taylor B R,B(a)rlocher F.Variable effects of air-drying on leaching losses from tree leaf litter[J].Hydrobiologia,1996,325:173-182.
  • 8Park S,Cho K.Nutrient leaching from leaf litter of emergent macrophyte (Zizania latifolia) and the effects of water temperature on the leaching process[J].Korean Journal of Biological Science,2003,7:289-294.
  • 9Benfield E F.Leaf breakdown in stream ecosystems.In:Hauer F R and Lamberti G A (eds),Methods in stream ecology[M].USA:Academic Press,1996,579-589.
  • 10Cummins K W,Wilzbach M A,Gates D M,et al.Shredders and riparian vegetation[J].BioScience,1989,39:24-30.

二级参考文献42

  • 1王备新,杨莲芳,胡本进,单林娜.应用底栖动物完整性指数B-IBI评价溪流健康[J].生态学报,2005,25(6):1481-1490. 被引量:195
  • 2柯欣,杨莲芳,孙长海,田立新.安徽丰溪河水生昆虫多样性及其水质生物评价[J].南京农业大学学报,1996,19(3):37-43. 被引量:28
  • 3于丹.溪流生态系统生态学研究[J].水生生物学报,1996,20(2):104-112. 被引量:6
  • 4Kelly MG, Whitton BA. Biological monitoring of eutrophication in rivers. Hydrobiologia, 1998, 384 : 55 -67.
  • 5Kwandrans J, Eloranta P, Kaweeka B, et al. Use of benthic diatom communities to evaluate water quality in rivers of southern Poland. Journal of Applied Phycology, 1998, 10:193-201.
  • 6Smith M J, Kay WR, Edward DHD, et al. AusRivAS: Using macroinvertebrates to assess ecological condition of rivers in Western Australia. Freshwater Biology, 1999, 41:269-282.
  • 7Karr JR. Defining and measuring river health. Freshwater Biology, 1999, 41:221-234.
  • 8Karr JR. Assessments of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries, 1951,6:21-27.
  • 9Kleynhans CJ. The development of a fish index to assess the biological integrity of South African rivers. Water SA, 1999, 25:265-278.
  • 10Allan JD, Johnson LB. Catchment-scale analysis of aquatic ecosystems. Freshwater Biology, 1997, 37: 107-111.

共引文献3

同被引文献296

引证文献15

二级引证文献103

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部