期刊文献+

急性心肌梗死“墓碑样”ST段改变的临床意义 被引量:2

Clinical significance and prognosis of "tombstoning" of ST segment in acute myocardial infarction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨急性心肌梗死(AMI)时,"墓碑样"ST段改变的临床意义和预后。方法:48例AMI患者,根据ST段形态分为墓碑样组(n=11)和对照组(n=37)。比较两组间ST段上抬高度、ST段抬高导联数、CK峰值、QT离散度、心脏严重并发症例数和死亡率以及广泛心肌梗死(ST段抬高导联数>5个)的发生例数。结果:除广泛心肌梗死的例数二组之间比较无差异(P>0.05)外,墓碑样组均大于对照组,差异显著(P<0.05)。墓碑样组室性心律失常的发生率和由此引起的死亡数亦大于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:有"墓碑样"ST段改变者预后较差,与心肌梗死范围相比,心肌缺血损伤程度较重可能是其预后不良的更重要原因。 Objective: For the invesligation of the clinical significance of 'tombstoning' of ST segment in AMI and its relation to prognosis. Methods: According to the shape of the ST segment, 48 patientswith AMI were divided into two groups: the tombstoning group (n = 11), and the control group (n = 37).The magnitude of ST elevation, QT interval dispersion, the number of cardiac complications, mortality and thenumber of cases with large - size infarct (the number of leads ST segment elevation > 5) in the tombstoninggroup were compared with those in the control. Results: The values of all the above items in the tombstoninggroup were significantly higher than those in the control (P < 0.05 ) except for the number of cases with large- size infarct (P > 0.05). A higher rale of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) and more deaths caused by VA inthe tombstoning group were observed more frequently than in the control, (P < 0.05) Conclusion: Patientswith tombstoning ST segments are usually poor in prognosis and severe myocardial ischemic injury might be amore important factor for poor prognosis than large - size infarct in these patients.
作者 刘平
出处 《急诊医学》 CSCD 1999年第1期28-30,共3页
关键词 急性 心肌梗死 墓碑样ST段 心电图 预后 Acute myocardial infarction Tombstoning ST segment
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

共引文献163

同被引文献4

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部