期刊文献+

GEO导航卫星多种观测资料联合精密定轨 被引量:15

The precise orbit determination of GEO navigation satellite with multi-types observation
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对跟踪站少、观测几何条件差以及轨道机动后GEO导航卫星精密定轨问题,提出了用激光观测数据解算无线电测距离观测数据设备时延、用CODE模型参数和多频载波相位数据进行电离层延迟精确修正的精密定轨和轨道快速恢复的处理体制.通过在轨实测数据实验证明,利用激光标定的距离观测数据组合设备时延精度优于1ns;基于3站观测数据GEO卫星精密定轨结果,RMS为0.25m;24h数据定轨结果重叠12小轨道径向互差0.55m,位置互差约1.62m;预报12h轨道重叠弧段互差为径向3.63m,位置互差8.51m;定轨结果与激光比对残差约0.10m,预报2h轨道比对残差约0.18m,预报24h轨道比对残差约2.04m.GEO卫星轨道机动后2~3h,动力学定轨结果能够恢复到与激光比对残差小于1m、与精密定轨结果比对位置互差约30m的水平.试验及分析结果表明,所提出的GEO精度定轨技术方案可靠、稳定. Tracked only by fewer stations which are weakly distributed in geometry, some thing such as the precise orbit determination and rapid orbit recovery after maneuver of GEO navigation satellite are discussed. The methods to solute the device delay of CC transfer observation by some SLR observation, or the so called "CODE model and multi-frequency carrier phase data" arithmetic to eliminate the CC observation ionosphere delay are advanced, as well the flows of GEO POD based on multi-types observation. Some practical experimentation can testify the validity of above-mentioned methods, and their results show that the solution precision of combined device delay is in 1 ns level. The RMS of the GEO POD only based three CC observation station is about 0.248 m, the 12 h overlap orbit difference of two determination results based on 24 h span observation are 0.55 m in radial direction and 1.62 m in three dimensions. The difference between determination results based on 24 h span observation and their predicted orbits by 12 h are 3.63 m in radial direction and 8.51 m in three dimensions. Compared with SLR observation, the RMS is about 0.10 m for POD results, 0.1 m for predicted orbit by 2 h, 2.04 m for predicted orbit by 24 h. The rapid recovery orbit precision can reach 30 m position level based 2–3 h CC transfer observation after maneuver, the RMS is less than 1 m compared with SLR data. At last, the POD covariance matrix analyze show that the POD method mention above can lead to steady results which is not very sensitive to the device day bias.
出处 《中国科学:物理学、力学、天文学》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第5期520-527,共8页 Scientia Sinica Physica,Mechanica & Astronomica
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划(编号:2007AA12Z345,2009AA12Z328) 中国博士后科学基金(编号:20080440092,200902259) 地球空间环境与大地测量教育部重点实验室开放基金(编号:06-07,08-01-07)资助项目
关键词 天体测量学 精密定轨 设备时延 协方差 astrometry precise orbit determination device delay covariance
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1杜兰 ,郑勇 ,王宏 ,张云飞 .地球静止卫星精密测定轨技术的现状及发展[J].飞行器测控学报,2005,24(6):14-18. 被引量:12
  • 2欧吉坤,刘吉华,孙保琪,彭碧波.镜面投影法确定地球同步卫星精密轨道[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2007,32(11):975-979. 被引量:14
  • 3陈刘成,李建文,唐波.区域卫星导航系统GEO卫星定轨观测模型[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2007,32(7):609-613. 被引量:6
  • 4Ellis J. Performance of a dedicated VLBI system for TDRSS navigation. Adv Astronaut Sci, 1983, 54(1): 111-126.
  • 5Tadashi S, Nobuyuki K. Precise orbit determination of a geosynchronous satellite by VLBI. Jpn Soc Aeronaut Space Sci, 1987, 35: 425- 432.
  • 6杜兰,郑勇,李杰.VLBI在GEO卫星精密定轨中的应用[J].测绘科学技术学报,2006,23(4):269-271. 被引量:11
  • 7Lichtent S W, Wu S C, Young L E, et al. New Techniques for Orbit Determination of Geosynchronous, Geosynchronous-transfer, and Other High Altitude Earth Orbits. AAS 97-676, Sun Valley, ID, USA, 1997.
  • 8Beutler G U H, Ploner M, Meindl M, et al. Determining the orbits of EGNOS satellites based on optical or microwave observations. Adv Space Res, 2005, 36:392-401.
  • 9Lyon R H. Geosynchronous Orbit Determination Using Space Surveillance Network Observations and Improved Radiative Force Modeling. Massachusetts: MIT, 2004.
  • 10Eddy F W, McCarthy J J, Pavlis D E, et al. Systems Description. GeodynⅡ Program, NASA, 1990.

二级参考文献87

共引文献134

同被引文献130

引证文献15

二级引证文献129

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部