期刊文献+

试析国际争端解决之司法化倾向 被引量:8

The Judicial Tendency of International Dispute Settlement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现当代国际争端的解决机制方面呈现出较为明显的司法化倾向。越来越多的国际"法律共识"、法律全球化对国际司法的促进、基于经济的理性选择、权力向规则的演进是国际争端解决机制司法化的成因。司法化现象反映了国际社会对以司法方式解决争端的需求在不断增加,意味着国际行为体之间和平解决争端有了更多选择。 For a long time, international dispute settlement mainly depended on political measures. In the contemporary era, however, a conspicuous judicial tendency emerges in international dispute settlement. More and more international "leagal mutual understand- ings', rational choices based on economical issues and the evolution from power to rules lead to the judieialization of international dispute settlement. This tendency indicates an increasing need of the international community for judicial dispute settlement, which means that there will be more choices for international subjects.
作者 王林彬
机构地区 新疆大学法学院
出处 《新疆大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2010年第1期34-37,共4页 Journal of Xinjiang University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 新疆大学博士科研启动项目"国际司法程序价值论"(BS080207)
关键词 国际争端解决 司法化 成因 争议 Lnternational Dispute Settlement, Judieialization, Causes, Disputes
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1ANAND R P. Enhancing the Acceptability of Compulsory Procedures of International Dispute Setdement[J]. Mar Planck Yearbook of Unite National Law, 2001(5).
  • 2MACKENZIE R,SANDS E International Court and Tribunals and the Independence of the International Judge[J]. Harvard International Law Journal, 2003,44( 1 ):283.
  • 3SLAUGHTER A-M. A Global Community of Courts[J]. Harvard International Law Journal, 2003,44(1 ):45.
  • 4O'CONNELL M E The Legalization of International Relations [M].Newyork:American Society of International,2002:291.
  • 5罗伯特·基欧汉,约瑟夫·奈.权力与相互依赖[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,1992:7.
  • 6熊玠.无政府状态与世界秩序[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,2001..
  • 7梅因 沈景一译.古代法[M].北京:商务印书馆,1984..
  • 8高鸿钧.现代法治的困境及其出路[J].法学研究,2003,25(2):3-31. 被引量:84
  • 9约翰·H·杰克.世界贸易体制[M].张乃根,译.上海:复旦大学出版社,2001.
  • 10爱德华·卡尔.20年危机:国际关系研究导论[M].秦亚青译.北京:世界知识出版社,2005.

二级参考文献10

  • 1R.M.Unger, Lasc in Modern Society: Toward a Criticism of Social Theory, The Free Press, 1976,pp.53-54.
  • 2G.Gilmore, The Death of Contract, Ohio State University Press, 1974.
  • 3R.M.Unger, Lasc in Modern Society: Toward a Criticism of Social Theory, The Free Press, 1976,pp.193-200.
  • 4G.de Q.Walker, The Rule of Law. Foundation of Constitutional Democracy, Melbourne University Press, 1988,Chapter 2.
  • 5M. Weber, Economy and Society : An Outline Interpretive Sociology, trans.by E.Fischoff et al, University of California Press, 1978, p. 954.
  • 6J.Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol.2, trans,by T. McCarthy, Beacon Press,1987,pp,347--350.
  • 7R. Cotterrell, Law' s Community : Legal Theory in Sociological Perspective, Clarendon Press, 1995,pp.315--337.
  • 8M.Taylor, Community, Anarchy and Liberty, Cambridge University Press, 1982, pp.25--33.
  • 9J.Habermas, Between Facts and Norms( Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Low and Democracy 》,transl.by W.Rehg,Polity Press, 1996,pp.402--407.
  • 10Kjell A Modeer, “European Legal Cultures: Traditions and Cultures in Contempory Eumpe,”in Tuuli Forgren & Martin Peteraon(eds.》, Cultural Crossroads in Europe, Produktion: Ord & Form AB, Uppsala, 1997, pp.73--75.

共引文献148

同被引文献114

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部