期刊文献+

同一医院5年期间活体供肾摘取后供者孤肾功能变化117例分析 被引量:1

Evaluation of single renal function in 117 donors following living renal transplantation during 5 years
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:通过在活体供肾摘取后对供者孤肾功能进行全面性、规律性、连续性地评估,了解供者孤肾在活体供肾摘取后的功能变化,从而分析活体供肾摘取的临床可行性。方法:选择亲属活体肾移植供者117例,肾摘取后通过连续监测血清肌酐水平、肾小球滤过率、尿常规及血压水平等各项指标,并在出院后坚持随访,全面评估供者孤肾在活体供肾摘取后的变化及供者的全身健康状况。结果:117例活体供肾患者均顺利接受手术,其中2例肾摘取后围手术期出现药物过敏反应;8例肾摘取后尿常规镜检有红细胞;5例出现微量蛋白尿;15例出现尿路感染;3例围手术期出现情绪焦虑,对自身健康状况表示担心;22例围手术期出现切口疼痛或不适;19例出现血压轻度增高,但均在正常血压范围内。所有供者肾摘取后均出现肾小球滤过率的下降,下降4~25mL/min,平均(9.4±4.7)mL/min,均未超出正常肾小球滤过率范围。所有供者肾摘取后均出现血清肌酐升高,43例在供肾后2个月时仍超过正常水平;在肌酐增长水平与肾小球滤过率下降程度的比较中,左侧与右侧孤肾、男性与女性供者间差异均无显著性意义;但50岁以上供者肌酐水平高于50岁以下供者(P<0.01)。所有患者经对症治疗后各项指标均恢复正常,除外5例肌酐水平至今仍异常,但均稳定在135μmol/L以内。结论:供者孤肾在活体供肾摘取后各项监测指标均有不同程度变化,甚至在短期内超出正常水平,但这些指标变化并不影响孤肾的整体功能,不影响供者的整体健康状况,从临床角度分析,活体供肾移植是安全可行的。 OBJECTIVE:To generally,regularly,and continuously evaluate single renal function in donors following living renal transplantation,to study functional changes of single kidney,and to analyze clinical feasibility of living renal transplantation.METHODS:A total of 117 living kidney donors had been selected in this study.Following renal transplantation,indicators of creatinine (Cr),glomerular filtration rate (GFR),urine microscopic examination,blood pressure were monitored and followed up so as to generally evaluate the variation of single renal function and health status of living donor.RESULTS:All 117 living donors accepted kidney transplantation successfully.There were untoward events including 2 cases for drug anaphylaxis,8 cases for microscopic hematuria,5 cases for proteinuria,15 cases for urinary tract infection,3 cases for anxious emotion after operation,and 22 cases for wound pain.The blood pressure was increased in 19 cases and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was decreased 4-25 mL/min with the average value of (9.4±4.7) mL/min in all cases,but the rates did not exceed the normal level.Nearly all of the cases displayed creatinine rising and 43 cases still had high creatinine level in 2 months after operation.There were no significant differences between creatinine level and sex,and left or right kidney of donor,but creatinine level of patients (〉 50 years old) was significantly higher than patients (〈 50 years old) (P〈0.01).Indicators of all cases returned the normal value after operation;however,creatinine level of 5 cases was still abnormal (135 μmol/L).CONCLUSION:The function detail could be fluctuated after living donor renal transplantation,or even exceeded the normal value,but the variation did not impact the whole function for the single kidney and influence the holistic health for donor,thus it could be safe and feasible for living donor renal transplantation.
机构地区 解放军第
出处 《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第53期10545-10548,共4页 Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
基金 全军"十一五"计划科技攻关课题(06G115)~~
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1王光策,张翥,王锁刚,闫天中,陈铸,于江琪.活体供肾者健康状况分析[J].中国中西医结合肾病杂志,2008,9(4):325-327. 被引量:3
  • 2Burnapp L,Lear P.United Kingdom Guidelines for Living Donor Kidney Transp lantation-Second Edition April 2005.British Transplantation Society/The Renal Association.2005.
  • 3Terasaki PI,Cecka JM,Gjertson DW,et al.High survival rates ofkidney transp lantation form spousal and living unrelated donors.N Engl J Med.1995;333(6):333-336.
  • 4Cai M,Shi B.Hand-assisted transperitoneal laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy.Transplant Proc.2004;36(7):1903-1904.
  • 5Meier Kriesche HU,Kaplan B.Waiting time on dialysis as the strongest modifiable risk factor for renal transp lant outcomes:A paired donor kidney analysis.Transplantation.2002;74:1377-1381.
  • 6Mange KC,Joffe MM,Feldman HI.Effect of the use or nonuse of long-term dialysis on the subsequent survival of renal transplants from living donors.N Engl J Med.2001;344:726-731.
  • 7Delmonic FL,Sheehy E,Marks WH,et al.Organ donation and utilization in the United States,2004.Am J Transplant.2005;5:862-873.
  • 8蔡明,石炳毅,杜国盛,钱叶勇,莫春柏,李州利,柏宏伟,阙士杰.经腹腔手辅助腹腔镜活体供肾摘取术[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2003,24(3):154-156. 被引量:21
  • 9Ingelfinger JR.Risks and benefits to the living donor.N Engl J Med.2005;353(5):447-449.
  • 10Delmonico F.A report of the amsterdam for rumon the care of the live kidney donor:data and medical guiderlines.Transplantation.2005;79(6 Suppl):S53-S66.

二级参考文献41

  • 1李建明,解吕中,王伟.亲属活体供肾肾移植12例[J].南通大学学报(医学版),2006,26(3):210-211. 被引量:1
  • 2石炳毅.应重视亲属活体供肾移植的医疗安全性[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(10):653-655. 被引量:41
  • 3和田达雄.脏器移植[M].东京:中山书店,1989.186-199.
  • 4林荣禧 吴卫真 等.亲属供肾肾移植(附6例报道)[J].中华器官移植杂志,2000,21(2):102-102.
  • 5林荣禧,中华器官移植杂志,2000年,2 1卷,2期,102页
  • 6Karakayali H,Morly G,Demirag A,et al.Long term follow up of 102 living kidney donors.Transp Proc,1998,30:721.
  • 7Cunningham J,Cass A,Anderson K,et al.Australian nephrologists' attitudes towards living kidney donation.Nephrol Dial Transplant,2006,21:1178-1183.
  • 8Alexander JW,Davies CB,First MR,et al.Singer pretransplant donor-specific transfusion in cadaver and living related donor renal transplantation.Transplant Proc,1993,25:485.
  • 9Cecka JM.The OPTN/UNOS renal transplant registry.Clin Transpl,2004:1-16.
  • 10Wolters HH,Schmidt-Traub H,Holzen HJ,et al.Living donor kidney transplantation from the elderly donor.Transplant Proc,2006,38:659-660.

共引文献121

同被引文献21

  • 1Yoshimura K, Takahara S, Kyakuno M , et al. Retroperitoneoscopic living relateddonor nephrectomy : clinical outcomes of 50 consecutive cases and comparison with open donor nephrectomy. J Endourol, 2005,19(7) :808 -812.
  • 2Simforoosh N, Basiri A, Tabibi A, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial. BJU Int. 2005 ;95 (6) :851 - 855.
  • 3Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ , Moore RG , et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation, 1995 , 60 (9) : 1047.
  • 4Yang SC, Park DS, Lee DH , et al. Retroperitoneal endoscopic live donor nephrectomy : report of 3 cases. J Urol. 1995 , 153 (6) : 1884 - 1886.
  • 5Bachmann A, Wolff T, Ruszat R, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic donor ne- phrectomy : retrospective, nonrandomized comparison of early complications, donor and recipient outcome with the standard open ap- proach. European Urology,2005,48:90 -96.
  • 6Tanabe K, Miyamoto N, Ishida H , et al. Retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy ( RPLDN ) : establishment and initial experience of RPLDN at a single center. Am J Transplant,2005,5 (4 Pt 1 ) :739 - 745.
  • 7Tanabe. K, Miyamoto. N, Tokumoto T, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy: Extended Experience in a Single Centerl. Transplantation Proceedings, 2004, 36(7), 1917- 1919.
  • 8Goel R, Modi P, Dodia S. Retroperitoneoscopic pretransplant native kidney nephreetomy. Int J Urol. 2006 , 13 (4) :337 -339.
  • 9Ruszat R, Sulser T, Dickenmann M, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy:donor outcome and complication rate in comparison with three different techniques. World J Urol, 2006,24 ( 1 ) : 113 - 117.
  • 10Simforoosh N, Bassiri A, Ziaee SA, et al. Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy: the first random ized clinical trial. Translant Proc,2003,35 (7) :2553 - 2554.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部