日粮中添加中草药与抗生素对本地鸡生产性能的影响

The influence of Chinese herhal medicine and antibiotic as additives on the productivity of local chicken

本试验针对本地鸡设计了A、B、C、D4种饲料进行饲养试验,结果表明:A组(混合型基础日粮+中草药添加剂)平均日增重比B组(混合型日粮+抗生素添加剂)、C组(玉米型基础日粮+中草药添加剂)、D组(玉米型基础日粮+抗生素添加剂)分别提高20.3%、18.2%、46.8%,与B、C组之间差异显著(P<0.05),与D组之间差异极显著(P<0.01);经济效益以A组最好,比B、C、D组分别提高26.37%、26.05%、59.75%;平均采食量A组比B、C、D组分别提高1.20%、0.87%、9.87%。A、B组比C、D组平均日增重提高19.94%,差异显著(P<0.05),经济效益提高26.04%;A、C组比B、D组平均日增重提高22.04%,差异显著(P<0.05),经济效益提高22.67%。因此,用稻米来代替部分玉米,用中草药添加剂代替抗生素添加剂是可行的,且能获得较好的日增重和经济效益。

The experiment designed four kinds of feed named A,B,C and D for local chicken,the result showed that group A＇s average daily gain （ADG） was higher 20.3%、18.2% and 46.8% than that of group B,C and D. The differences between group A and group B,C was marked （P〈0.05）,and significant between group A and group D（P〈0.01）. The economic benefits of group A was best,and its higher 26.37%、26.05% and 59.75% than that of group B,C and D. The group A＇s AFI was higher 1.20%,0.87%,9.87% than that of groupB,C and D. Guoup A and B＇s ADG was higher 19.94% than that of group C and D,and the economic benefits increased 26.04%. Group A and C＇s ADG was higher 22.04% than that of group B and D,and the economic benefits increased 22.67%. So we concluded that it was feasible to use rice instead of corn,use Chinese herbal medicine instead of antibiotic to feed chicken,the ADG and economic benefits were also better.