期刊文献+

北京市驾驶行为与影响因素分析 被引量:22

Driving Behavior and Influential Factors Study in Beijing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究北京市驾驶行为的特征及其影响因素。对曼彻斯特驾驶行为问卷进行修订,考虑多种因素对驾驶行为的影响,对135名北京市汽车驾驶者进行问卷调查。经因子分析,得到5个驾驶行为因子分别是"错误"、"失误"、"非故意违规"、"故意违规"和"过激行为",符合预期的因子结构。对驾驶行为的各类影响因素进行方差分析,结果表明与驾驶行为紧密相关的影响因素主要是驾驶者的自我评价和态度,如驾驶者对自己是否易受情绪影响的评价和对交通法规的态度等。驾驶培训经历,包括驾驶培训的地点和驾驶培训的时间跨度,也对驾驶行为存在一定影响。性别、年龄等其他因素对驾驶行为的影响相对较小。与西方男家相比,中国汽车化历史较短,驾驶行为具有不同的特点。 This paper investigates driving behavior and its influential factors.Based on the redacted Manchester Driving Behavior Questionnaire in which the possible influencing factors were considered,a survey was conducted in Beijing involving 135 car drivers.Data analysis found out that driving behavior in Beijing can be characterized in five categories:"errors","lapses","unintentional violations","deliberate violations",and "emotional aggravations".ANOVA study found out that the foremost influencing factor of driving behavior is the driver's self-assessment: driver's mood status(able to concentrate?) and attitude towards driving(willing to obey traffic law?).Driver training and education experience(DTE),such as where and when DTE took place,were also found out to influence driving behavior to some extent and this has not been reported in precious studies.On the other hand,gender,age,and other related factors were found out to have little influence.Motorization in China's urban cities has a relatively short history,which may explain the different driving behaviors in Beijing from those in the West.
作者 白云 石京
出处 《交通信息与安全》 2010年第2期114-119,共6页 Journal of Transport Information and Safety
基金 国家科技支撑计划项目(批准号:2007BAKB06) 国家科技支撑计划项目(批准号:2009BAG13A05)资助
关键词 驾驶行为 驾驶培训 因子分析 方差分析 driving behaviors driver training and education factor analysis analysis of variance
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献16

  • 1李彦章,王正国,尹志勇,朱佩芳.摩托车驾驶员驾驶行为问卷的编制及其信度效度检验[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(8):82-83. 被引量:9
  • 2杨慧芳.攻击行为的社会信息加工模式研究述评[J].心理科学,2002,25(2):244-245. 被引量:34
  • 3[1]Hennessy DA, Wiesenthal DL. The relationship between driver aggression, violence and vengeance. Violence & Victims,2002;17(6):356.
  • 4[2]Miller M, Azrael D, Hemenway D. 'Road rage'in Arizona: armed and dangerous. Accid Anal Prev,2002;36(6):807.
  • 5[5]James L, Nahl D. Road rage and aggressive driving: steering clear of highway warfare. New York: John Gienn Drive Amherst,2000:46 67.
  • 6[7]Harris LR, Bohnhoff K. Gender and aggression: 11.Personal aggressiveness. Sex roles,1996;35(5):27.
  • 7[8]Hennessy DA, Wiesenthal DL. Gender, driver aggression, and driver violence: An applied evaluation. Sex Roles,2001;44(4):661.
  • 8[9]Deffenbacher JL, Oetting ER, Lynch RS. Development of a driving anger scale. Psychological Reports,1994;74(1):83.
  • 9[10]Wiesenthal DL, Hennessy DA, Gibson P. The Driving Vengeance Questionnaire (DVQ): The development of a scale to measure deviant drivers'attitudes. Violence & Victims,2000;15(4):115.
  • 10[11]Blanchard EB, Barton KA, Malta L. Psychometric of a measure of aggressive driving: The Larson driver's stress profile. Psychological reports,2000;87(3 pt1):881.

共引文献23

同被引文献197

引证文献22

二级引证文献167

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部