期刊文献+

大宗股权转让、溢价补偿与再融资 被引量:1

Block Share Transfer,Compensation of Premium and Refinancing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以大宗股权转让且控制权转移的上市公司为研究对象,考察通过支付溢价获得控制权后控制性股东通过上市公司进行再融资与攫取控制权收益来补偿溢价支付之间的内在关系。以1997~2003年股权转让相关数据为基础,就4种方法计算控制权溢价水平,所得结论一致支持控制权转移以溢价方式进行。研究发现,控制性股东通过再融资攫取控制权收益来补偿溢价支付,回归分析表明溢价水平与预计募集资金总额正相关;控制性股东对配股和增发方式的时间偏好上存在差异,且所制定的再融资方案与再融资方案的市场整体水平相比更为激进,例如更高的发行价格和融资比例。研究发现,再融资能够有效地补偿溢价支付,并且增发方式下的补偿效率更高。 The premium transfer of control rights means that control rights could bring additional revenue.What's the inter linkages between the purpose of refinancing and controlling shareholder compensating control premium through snatching benefits of control after transfer of control of listed companies are inadequate.Based on the data from 1997 to 2003,we use three methods to calculate control premium and the conclusions support the transfer of shares in premium manner again in which the premium of block transfer of shares with the transfer of control are much higher,and the subsequent two years nearly 60% of the companies established refinancing programs with more radical plans compared with the average,such as higher prices and the financing size.The study found that refinancing is an effective compensation premium payment,and seasoned equity issues is more efficient.Regression analysis also found that there are positive relationship betweens premium levels and the equity transfer pricing,circulated share ratio,predict financing size and negative relationship between premium levels and new assets per share.
作者 贾明 张喆
出处 《系统管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第2期170-176,共7页 Journal of Systems & Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70902066) 西北工业大学科研启动项目(R0276) 西北工业大学人文社科与管理振兴项目 西安交通大学校内基金资助项目(08140005)
关键词 股权转让 控制权收益 溢价补偿 再融资 share transfer benefits of control premium compensation refinancing
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Zingales L.What determines the value of corporate Votes?[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics) 1995 (11):1047-1073.
  • 2Holderness C G.A survey of blockholders and corporate control[J].FRBNY Economic Policy Reviewt 2003(4),51-64.
  • 3Nenova T.The value of corporate votes and control benefits:A cross-country analysis[J].Journal of Fi-anncial Ecnomics,2003,68(3):325-351.
  • 4La Porta R,Lopez-de-Silanes F,Andrei S,et al.Investor protection and corporate governance[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2000,58:3-37.
  • 5La Porta R,Lopez-de-Silanes,Shleifer F,et al.Investor protection and corporate valuation[J].Journal of Finance,2002,57,1147-1170.
  • 6Shleifer A,Daniel W.Investor protection and equitymarkets[J].Journal of Financial Ecnomics,2002,66:5-27.
  • 7Alexander D,Imigi Z.Private benefits of control:An international comparison[J].Journal of Finance,2004,LIX(2):537-600.
  • 8唐宗明,余颖,俞乐.我国上市公司控制权私人收益的经验研究[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2005,14(6):509-513. 被引量:31
  • 9齐伟山,欧阳令南.我国上市公司控制权收益的实证研究[J].金融教学与研究,2004(6):41-43. 被引量:14
  • 10韩德宗,叶春华.控制权收益的理论与实证研究[J].统计研究,2004,21(2):42-46. 被引量:106

二级参考文献240

共引文献1351

同被引文献7

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部